Anonymous ID: 3be471 Feb. 17, 2019, 11:27 a.m. No.5226296   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Earlier this week, former Acting Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe, revealed that the US intelligence community had considered removing the US president from office in May 2017 after he unexpectedly fired the bureau’s then-director, James Comey.

 

Following the revelations by Andrew McCabe, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, who is the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, promised he would hold a hearing on McCabe’s comments about a discussion to remove Trump, which he described as an “administrative coup”.

 

"So through good reporting by '60 Minutes’, there's an allegation by the acting FBI director at the time that the deputy attorney general was basically trying to do an administrative coup, take the president down to the 25th Amendment process. The deputy attorney general denies it. So I promise your viewers the following, that we will have a hearing about who's telling the truth, what actually happened", he told CBS, promising to do everything “to get to the bottom of the Department of Justice FBI behavior toward President Trump and his campaign”.

 

Two FBI lawyers in congressional testimony backed the statement that Deputy Attorney General for the US Department of Justice Rod Rosenstein considered secretly taping US President Donald Trump, Bloomberg reports. They also informed US lawmakers that two unidentified White House officials supported the idea of removing Trump from office using the 25th Amendment in May 2017, when the commander-in-chief fired FBI Director James Comey.

 

https://sputniknews.com/us/201902171072513969-fbi-rosenstein-mccabe-trump-taping/

Anonymous ID: 3be471 Feb. 17, 2019, 11:56 a.m. No.5226841   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5226748

>I'm having the time of my life on here with all you cunts!

 

Hmm… that's just what a catgirl from outer space would say. Can you prove that you're not a catgirl from outer space?

 

Everyone who disagrees with me is a catgirl from outer space and the burden of proof is on everyone but me!

 

>>5226775

>Not a bot. Name calling does not make the facts I post any less factual;

 

Oh, sure, you say you are just an ordinary Anon. But everyone I dislike has to prove that they are real Anons to my satisfaction. How can you prove that you're not a catgirl from outer space? You don't just have to prove a negative, you have to prove it in the way that I recognize … and every time you ask me to explain, I can use that as proof that you are not an Anon! The logic never ends!