Look at the POTUS re-tweets of things POTUS has said before, if the last two are like the rest, there is a counter imbedded in the hours and seconds, while the day delta and minute delta will remain constant. The last was 3d, 3h, 5m, 11s versus 3d, 2h, 5m, 22s. So the hours were decrementing while the seconds were incrementing. I predicted, incorrectly, that a new message would come out via Q or POTUS at the 1hr mark. But s/he and POTUS began posting about 20 minutes after my prediction had expired, so there may be a sliding scale baked in somewhere that we can't see. It reminds me of the citation that Q gave to NASA countdown holds but I'm not sure why the seconds were incrementing unless there were just two disconnected coincidences. Will post a proof later.
Good work. Not sure I'm smart enough to pull all that together. I'm grateful for SerialBrain and those who read his/her articles. Makes sense that we are coming out of T-27 and holding now.
Remember T-4437&T-4438 was paired up with T-4466&T-4467? All about FBI and McCabe?
T-4438 14FEB2019 21:55:09 is the same message as T-4466 17FEB2019 18:49:31.
T-4437 14FEB2019 21:39:50 is the same message as T-4467 17FEB2019 18:49:28.
4438 21:54:69
-
4466 18:49:31
—————————-
3Days 03:05:38
Which is:
DD HH MM SS
-
-
-
11 (3+8=11)
-
-
4437 20:99:50
-
4467 18:49:28
—————————-
3Days 02:05:22
Which is:
DD HH MM SS
-
-
-
22
-
-
Comparing the delta between the two we see the following:
DD HH MM SS
-
[03.] 05. [11]
-
[02.] 05. [22]
I haven't taken that process against any other messages POTUS wrote and then retweeted but if this was intentional then I think the anons looking for zero second delays between tweets and Q posts are missing the bigger picture about what is being communicated via those deltas.