>>5225610 (pb)
Thinking about why would Q make two posts rather than a combined post. The simplistic view is of course to correspond to POTUS two video tweets to provide extra proof of coordination. But do we really need more proofs or [0] Deltas? I still come back to the fact that part of the sequence was a forced word mistake (you). The explanation is because they are on the move and the mistake was made due to lack of focus. Not buying that. Q is trying to tell us something in addition to the synced posts.