>>>524082
>This is the thing about those laws: they're fine when you've got a President you like in office. I remember arguing with Liberals during the Obama campaign–they were saying that the government needed to be given more power, so they could clean house. I asked them "so what happens when a Republican becomes President? Will you like those laws then?"
>Republicans and Democrats alike enjoy taking liberties with the interpretations of laws. Obama was particularly bad, as a trained lawyer. With no media to call him out on it, we got absolutely fucked.
>I don't like this talk about gun control based on mental illness, or anything of the like. The only thing I'll go for is a neurologist verifying that the person has the exact same mental illness that is susceptible to conditioning–not the fucking liberal psychologists that have backed up the nonsense we hear in the media, such as "some couples could benefit from cuckolding."
>Psychology has a scant few real scientists, and a vast raft of idiots trying to make a name and buck for themselves. Just look at Freud's body of work.
>It's just like "global warming." The definition of "mental illness" will change to fit the agenda of whatever party is in office. I don't want kiss men. Supposedly that makes me "homophobic." Sounds like a mental illness–can they take my gun now?
GEOTUS is putting the gun grabbers in a no-win situation for the 2018 elections.
He's intentionally sabotaged the discussion by encouraging the elimination of due process, provoking a constitutional problem of age vs voting, and demanding it all be rolled into a single bill (which can easily be defeated by SCOTUS)