Anon, he was speaking of a specific situation where if someone online made a threat to come after someone w/a gun, take the gun from them so they CAN'T use it to follow through. They would be charged with terroristic threat anyway, so confiscate the weapon & let the courts determine the path from there on. It could save someone's life in that situation. That's all he was saying & it's being taken WAY out of context.
He was speaking of a specific situation where if someone online made a threat to come after someone w/a gun, take the gun from them so they CAN'T use it to follow through. They would be charged with terroristic threat anyway, so confiscate the weapon & let the courts determine the path from there on. It could save someone's life in that situation. That's all he was saying & it's being taken WAY out of context.
It's another trap for the left. They are praising Mueller & now Sessions. They won't be able to say Trump used "his" people to get a favorable outcome. We'll see how much they love them after they totally exonerate Trump, & go after the left's heroes. It will be GLORIOUS. It's optics. JMHO.
He's just being lippy about this article that NBC did about Mueller questioning Trump re: "hacked DNC emails". Podesta thinks, of course that Trump is guilty of something…anything. Don't be nervous.
COVFEFE - Communications Over Various Feeds Electronically for Engagement or 'COVFEFE' Act.
http:// www.ladbible.com/now/politics-interesting-a-democratic-congressman-has-just-introduced-the-covfefe-act-20170612
10 years from now if I make a terroristic threat to someone online, that automatically qualifies me for an arrest & subsequent investigation, etc. If a threat like that is made, I've just deemed myself a threat.
You are talking about outright gun confiscation if they just "come to get my weapons" for no reason. Just someone saying you are a threat won't get it. Need that proof in writing or verbally.Two different things as I see it.
Agree!