dChan
Anonymous ID: c0fb25 Feb. 28, 2018, 10:40 p.m. No.523605   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3643 >>3672

Had another mirror thought. Someone mentioned that 10/30 is the mirror of 03/01.

 

On 2/18, Q said the clock is activated. He's said similar things around 10 days of darkness.

 

So maybe, once the clock is activated it takes TEN DAYS to wind the clock, which would bring us to 2/28. From then, the clock is "rewound" to the beginning. Which would be 03/01 (today), the mirror of 10/30.

 

He did something similar are 12/7 I think and I think there was another one in January. It's always been around when Q decides to give us more public info or move up the timeline. I think when he does that, he "marks" the clock to begin the wind, which takes 10 days, and then the date we're at corresponds to the beginning of the clock again (10/30).

 

Which would make that 11/3 post about Podesta as now 3/5, which is Monday. Stuff usually happens on Monday.

Anonymous ID: c0fb25 Feb. 28, 2018, 10:52 p.m. No.523659   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3667 >>3718

>>523654

 

Right. IF they were about to PUBLICLY announce his arrest soon, then he's already in custody. They'd have his social media. He could be tweeting as a hint to us that they've got him. Or it's really him.

Anonymous ID: c0fb25 Feb. 28, 2018, 11:07 p.m. No.523737   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3745

>>523722

 

I think we both might be right. You know in a video game, there's a map? And as you proceed through the game, you "unlock" new areas of the map? Well, what if Q made the map (the drops), and we find the markers on the map via the news? But once you find the key, then the rest of the map unlocks?

Anonymous ID: c0fb25 Feb. 28, 2018, 11:09 p.m. No.523745   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>523737

>>523736

 

Because he also keeps talking about the KEY. Which implies on thing, outside of the news events that unlock areas of the map. I do agree that they wouldn't have something lying around that clowns could find. But there is some sort of key.

Anonymous ID: c0fb25 Feb. 28, 2018, 11:20 p.m. No.523800   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3820 >>3837

>>523789

 

Perhaps that's PRECISELY why he did it? Wouldn't that establish, in a way, that all tweets are protected speech? And therefore, you can't ban conservatives because that's a violation of 1st amendment.

Anonymous ID: c0fb25 Feb. 28, 2018, 11:27 p.m. No.523847   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3892

>>523829

>>523833

 

Which spaces would we correspond to in the drops? Could it be days (spaces) between drops? Or is it just that, if there is a drop that has the same number of spaces as a tweet, then they are linked. Are the number of spaces relevant?