Anonymous ID: cb0f60 Feb. 28, 2018, 10:46 p.m. No.523632   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3638

>>523601

That's interesting. I hadn't really looked into that, to many other things.

 

The group I found is different (I think):

< https:// www.awan.org. uk/

 

They seem like they would be a better contact than a multinational group–less likely to draw attention, and the typical kind of group that Liberals love to associate themselves with. But when you see politicians dealing with multinational corporations, alarm bells go off.

 

Wouldn't be surprised if there was some dirt somewhere.

Anonymous ID: cb0f60 Feb. 28, 2018, 11:03 p.m. No.523717   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>523639

I think there's something to be said for the clock starting at an actual time rather than a day. For instance–if it starts 12/24 at 12:00 AM, Dec. 25th is really only one day away.

 

We also have to consider the possibility that there may be a missing post from the 27th. Q was posting anonymously at 4chan when he started–no signature, nothing. I would think that he would've said something if one was missing, but who knows?

Anonymous ID: cb0f60 Feb. 28, 2018, 11:25 p.m. No.523833   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3847 >>3849

>>523722

Q has never responded to me, so I can't really say much. But I've found things that answer his questions almost verbatim. For me, the most fruitful sources have been reports from government entities and thinktanks.

 

We know he responds to books as well–when Anon mentioned "Behold a Pale Horse," he said it was "BIG."

 

I imagine Q is away for one or more of the following reasons:

1) he's busy carrying out the plan

2) he's giving us time to flesh-out the map

3) his absence is part of the map

 

God knows that whenever he posts, everything else gets dropped…and there are so many things that we haven't looked at, even with the new things that we've learned. For instance–the mirroring thing today. Here's another one I just found out: post #333 (Dec 11th) and post #395 (Dec 19th) both have a 20 space gap in them.

 

I don't think Q is sad when we don't find the news. I think -we're- sad when Q isn't giving us new stuff. But we have to use this time to reflect on what we already have, because as he's said, we have more than we know.

Anonymous ID: cb0f60 Feb. 28, 2018, 11:40 p.m. No.523919   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3956

>>523844

I was reading somewhere about how these mass data parsing programs, and even AI still needs humans to guide it. I can't remember what article it was.

 

But I don't think Q needs us to find this stuff out–I think he already has far more than we can comprehend. But I think they need us to be engaged. If I had just been given a bunch of links to Foreign Policy law and reports from think tanks, I would've skipped over to /b or /gif in about 18 seconds. As it is, I've learned so much about foreign policy I feel like I could mount a successful campaign to invade Morocco or something.

 

Some military anons had said that chan culture was something the military had been looking to cultivate for awhile, for memetic warfare. Honestly, I don't mind–I'm glad they came. Because I have seen this bullshit happening for years, and nobody called it out. I'm old enough to remember when "rap" started getting big–late 80's, for the most part. You had the Cosby show, where America saw successful, educated blacks trying to make it like everyone else…then suddenly there was this big push for people to accept "black culture" as separate but equal. I knew it was a huge mistake back then…but after so many huge mistakes, I think I'm ready to believe that they weren't mistakes after all.

Anonymous ID: cb0f60 Feb. 28, 2018, 11:50 p.m. No.523970   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>3981

>>523887

Here's how you can quickly verify what other Anons are telling you: copy & paste the post into a word processing program, then delete each space and count as you go. No matter what font you use, no matter whether it's in caps or not, you'll only be able to fit a word with 'x' amount of letters.

 

Also, the reason certain fonts are called "monospace" is because every letter, no matter whether capitalized or lower case, will take up the same amount of space.

 

Trust us on this–it's the number of spaces. Otherwise, you would have nearly infinite possibilities and nobody would even venture guessing.

Anonymous ID: cb0f60 Feb. 28, 2018, 11:55 p.m. No.524002   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4009 >>4032 >>4082

>>523854

I haven't been watching the news, just hearing Anons come in and talk about it.

 

If a law is passed to take guns away, my days spent helping the cause are over, and my days helping to boost the opposition will have just begun. I am loyal to the President so long as he is loyal to God and the Constitution.

 

But I have faith that it's all for show, between both he and Sessions. My gut feeling is that he'll do this until the big news drops, then the news cycle will get off of it and it will be forgotten. By doing this, he positions himself as a centrist. Same as Sessions. But I bet something will come before any actionable response comes up.

 

Remember, it takes months to get anything done in DC. Potus could signal support today, they get the bill drafted and finalized in two months, big conspiracy revealed, boom, veto, forget about it.

Anonymous ID: cb0f60 March 1, 2018, 12:03 a.m. No.524036   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4062

>>523981

I can't remember how the whole "counting spaces" thing worked. Some anons said that we should look for lines in Q's posts that had "x" amount of characters, so I found every line that had that many and posted them. By the time that was done, they'd figured something else out. Maybe it had to do with going 18 posts back, I can't remember. At that point, I wasn't going to bother any more.

Anonymous ID: cb0f60 March 1, 2018, 12:29 a.m. No.524143   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4182 >>4192

>>524082

This is the thing about those laws: they're fine when you've got a President you like in office. I remember arguing with Liberals during the Obama campaign–they were saying that the government needed to be given more power, so they could clean house. I asked them "so what happens when a Republican becomes President? Will you like those laws then?"

 

Republicans and Democrats alike enjoy taking liberties with the interpretations of laws. Obama was particularly bad, as a trained lawyer. With no media to call him out on it, we got absolutely fucked.

 

I don't like this talk about gun control based on mental illness, or anything of the like. The only thing I'll go for is a neurologist verifying that the person has the exact same mental illness that is susceptible to conditioning–not the fucking liberal psychologists that have backed up the nonsense we hear in the media, such as "some couples could benefit from cuckolding."

 

Psychology has a scant few real scientists, and a vast raft of idiots trying to make a name and buck for themselves. Just look at Freud's body of work.

 

It's just like "global warming." The definition of "mental illness" will change to fit the agenda of whatever party is in office. I don't want kiss men. Supposedly that makes me "homophobic." Sounds like a mental illness–can they take my gun now?

Anonymous ID: cb0f60 March 1, 2018, 12:42 a.m. No.524199   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4211

>>524166

It's a good question, but I don't think so. Here's why: most of those people were associated with Trump's campaign. If they're primary reason for interacting with us is that they're trying to get support for Trump, then why stop? Even if you didn't have access to Top Secret intel, you could get enough info that nobody else would have access to–what cup Trump is drinking from today, maybe some words he'll say in an upcoming speech. That, plus sitting in on some strategy sessions might give you enough. Then there's talk around the office.

 

If they were campaigning for Trump, they would never step away–they'd just keep working it for all they could. What's going on here isn't a sales pitch–it's some masterwork artisanship. I decided awhile ago that even if it were fake, it's the best fake I'll likely ever witness in my life. Besides, I used to play D&D when I was a kid, and I enjoyed it. The possibility that we could be making -real- change is something I barely let myself believe.

Anonymous ID: cb0f60 March 1, 2018, 12:52 a.m. No.524236   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>4250

>>524211

I have never, ever been one to believe in conspiracies. At all. But show me a trail of evidence in the form of government documents and other reliable sources, and I'll listen. I've seen the documents outlining how Obama was giving cash to Iran for dissemination to terrorists. I've read about how North Korea was trying to get a Mig through the Panama Canal under tons of sugar. I've read about how two guys using Palantir were able to figure out who was getting stuff into North Korea (C4ADS report)–the entire US intelligence community has access to Palantir and more; do you think -they- didn't know, or did someone up top tell them not to do anything about it?

 

The crumbs have been laid, and I have followed the trail, and it isn't bullshit after all. Honestly, I still find myself worrying that we're going to see a video of Johnny Knoxville showing us all the evidence he put before us. Regardless, I've learned a lot of things I never knew before, and sharpened a lot of skills. If this is a larp, I've still learned more in 4 months than I've learned in the past 8 years of watching news.