>>5234742 (lb)
Torn between libertarian leaning views and common sense here….
I see no problem with firearms of any type (always wanted a 40mm twin Bofors for home perimeter defense), but I think you have to draw the line at missile systems of any type. I don't want my black neighbors getting ahold of Javelin anti-tank missiles. We just started getting this neighborhood cleaned up.
Information without the ability to act on said information useless. Only a state actor would posses the weaponry needed to penetrate stated defenses and that would be suicide for the regime who tried.
It's useless information presented as a vehicle to sell you SUV's and cruise ship vacations. POTUS is safe.
The answer my fren is Tits.
What's better than waking up and seeing a spectacular set of sweater cows first thing in the morning? Tits can mollify even the most disturbed partisan. Tits are the secret to world peace.
I'm against foreign military sales all together. Good luck getting that through congress though. Foreign countries should defend themselves. That means developing their own weapons industry or being absorbed by another country. Too many little piss ant "Republics" on the map because someone's ancestors got genocided.
I would like to point out that the the minorities would be pinching the product all day and the women would be calling in with female plumbing problems or child care issues. You want an unmarried, lazy drop out white dude in his mid 30's to run that shit.
I believe that not only should lynching remain legal, but that it should be expanded in northern and western states. Why take a powerful tool against general uppityness and inter-racial dating amongst our most at-risk youth out of the hands of the general public?