dChan
Anonymous ID: bfc8fc Feb. 17, 2019, 10:06 p.m. No.5237737   🗄️.is 🔗kun

This has been eating at me for some time, so I finally sat down and looked at all the "misspellings" from Q because, frankly, I think the changes are high that some or all of these are on purpose. q831 directs us that, "misspellings matter". This post precedes all "misspelled" posts or their "disregard" posts. Tonight, when q2777 (Holy Trips) was wasted on a "disregard", it was time to give in and dig. What I post here only points out superficially interesting things, but maybe some more autistic anons can see if there is anything to this. I may also have missed some "misspelled" Q posts or their disregard.

 

  1. I find it hard to believe that with this well planned op, anything is left to chance; particularly the risk of fat fingering coded messages to obsessively autistic anons.

  2. It makes me wonder, exactly, what is the "platform" being used. I do not want to speculate to heavily, but I think about this often. Would Q really use a mobile phone? And thinking about the logistics of not only having to type the post (or copy past it from another source), how is he entering in trip code? You fat finger that, and that's a real facepalm..but, IIRC correctly this did happen once. Not too long ago. The trip was different (fat finger?) and before I could get a cap, it was fixed. This tells me that however he is posting, it is possible to fat finger the necessarily long and complex tripcode password. This lends credence to the notion that he could be phonefagging, in which case the typos could indeed be legitimate.

  3. Again, is it likely that Q would post without precise review of the message, knowing that he may accidentally burn some anon brain cycles - wasting valuable time and credibility? He does post "disregard" QUICKLY (but reasonable for a human to post it, so again could be legitimately an error).

  4. POTUS and others have arguably signalled "Q Post" numbers; if they are accidentally wasting post numbers, wouldn't this throw off any elaborate number scheme they've employed when mentioning these numbers in tweets and speeches? Seems to me, wasting post numbers is an accident they really wouldn't want to make.

 

Without further ado, here are the relevant posts:

 

q0926 RT q0923 (via Anonymous >>615000 (pb))

q1141 RT q1140

q1469 RT >>1714826 (pb)

q1571 RT q1570

q1745 RT –

q1746 RT q1745 (preemptive "disregard spelling" only, not a 'disregard' to q1745)

q2704 RT q2703

q2705 RT q2704 (disregard the disregard)

q2716 RT q2715

q2777 RT q2776)

 

Superficial notes of interest:

 

  1. q1745 and q1746 - these both have similar preemptive qualifiers are the end. The numbers also strike me as interesting: 17-45, 17-46; 17=Q, 45=POTUS, 46=next_POTUS (I didn't dig into words of the posts in any of these cases)

  2. The recent series of the "accidental" disregard - q2703, q2704, q2705 -going back to the notion that wasting numbers is not a desirable thing.

  3. q2777 - Holy Trips, as we've been trained to care about is wasted on a "disregard"; side note, q2778 is a RT q2776 - if the "mistake" happened, this RT would have q2777 - signifying what to anons? More to the point that post numbers also matter.

  4. I have included q2278 (most recent) for your convenience

  5. The frequency of "mistakes" seems to be on the rise; coincidence?

 

Open Issues:

 

  1. Q never says what the misspelling was, in most cases anyway. I am also very bad at finding where the misspell occurred. If an anon finds it worth his time, collating the corrections might yield interesting results. In the past, with misspelled POTUS tweets I've seen anons correlate them with other letters in kill boxes to come up with a message based on the "incorrect" letters/words.

  2. Are there any more interesting correlations with the above posts/timing? Deltas? For example, there is a 3 day delta between the misspelling/disregard pair q2716 and q2777. I did not include deltas in my attached research, but I did notice that one.

  3. Anything else?

 

This is not to waste time or spin wheels. I think going too far down the rabbit hole here would a bad idea. So keeping any additional digs/contributions as superficial as possible might be a good idea.

 

Finally, please disregard any misspellings or mistakes above. They were definitely not on purpose.