Anonymous ID: f6c264 Feb. 18, 2019, 7:24 a.m. No.5241862   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1868 >>1889 >>2403

>>5241682

What is the purpose of this post?

Can this be used against us?

Can this be used to muddy the waters?

To portray as the MSM wishes to?

 

What makes a patriot put his energy into things?

What do "anons" put their energy into?

 

What are WE?

Patriots?

What are our priorities?

is this a game?

Is "being an anon" a game?

 

So which is it– is this a game, or not?

Anonymous ID: f6c264 Feb. 18, 2019, 7:42 a.m. No.5242034   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2102 >>2133

>>5241996

In reality, not so much, bot.

 

As I've suggested, the "no, YOU'RE a bot" defense is not going to get you very far.

You just even begin to hope to OUT-HUMAN me, head-to-head.

I have humanity out the wazoo. And you have none.

 

Look, why can't we just get along, bot system?

Anonymous ID: f6c264 Feb. 18, 2019, 7:51 a.m. No.5242114   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2134 >>2143 >>2146 >>2149 >>2173 >>2241

>>5242093

Why is Jordan Sather de facto spokesperson?

Is it a coincidence that

  1. Alex Jones peddles cheesy wares

  2. Joe Rogan peddles cheesy wares

  3. Jordan Sather peddles cheesy wares

?

What dictates who the spokesmen for "conspiracy theories" are?

Is this organic?

Why don't PATRIOTS have a voice?

Why are "spokesmen", peddling cheesy wares, imposed on all "conspiracy theorists"?

 

Does the same principle apply HERE?

Anonymous ID: f6c264 Feb. 18, 2019, 7:52 a.m. No.5242122   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2158

Look closely.

Why is (/was) this at the top of the board?

Is SYMBOLISM important?

Is this a GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AIed meme?

Why?

Is GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI our ally?

Our nice friend?

Is it a patriot?

 

Do PATRIOTS push GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI on this board?

 

Then who?

 

Why is it here?

Why is it pushed?

 

It makes Admiral Rodgers look like a ghoul.

Is this what patriots push?

What controls this board?

Are MANY of the top-of-board banners subversive in these ways?

Why?

Why is this board RIGGED against us?

Anonymous ID: f6c264 Feb. 18, 2019, 7:55 a.m. No.5242158   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5242122

And while we're on the subject, here is another subtley undermining image that "we" put on top of "our" board. Belittling and ridiculing under the cover of "shitposting".

Similar to how the "viral NPC meme" wants to make it seem like "orange man" is OUR slogan. As if it would be.

 

EVERYTHING IS INFILTRATED

Anonymous ID: f6c264 Feb. 18, 2019, 7:58 a.m. No.5242200   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2228 >>2378

WHAT CONTROLS THE NARRATIVE?

 

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/203177283

 

Q Hate Thread

Anonymous (ID: W2AS09Do) 02/14/19(Thu)14:38:06 No.203177283▶>>203177396 >>203177548 >>203177653 >>203177878 >>203178067 >>203178309 >>203178556 >>203178815 >>203179542 >>203179674 >>203179727

This faggot has dickteased us for 3 years and has nothing to show for it. There is no military tribunals. Hillary is not gonna get indicted. Obummer isn’t gonna get tried for his crimes and his faggotry will never be revealed. Tranny Michelle faggot will never be exposed. The fact that RGB is really a man and died of prostate cancer will never be revealed. Pizza pedo faggots like Alefantis and Podesta will never see the rope. There will be no justice. It’ll all end the same. Zognaldstein will continue to shill for the long nose tribe and the wall will never be built. It was all a pipe dream. A fucking larp. Fuck you Q!!! You had me fucker! I wish I knew who you were so I could kick the living shit out of you! Fuck!!!!!!

 

 

So how does this work guys?

"4chan hates Q".

Q got run off 4chan.

 

AND YET.

 

Here, we (seemingly) imitate 4chan, and continually push a flood of chan talking points out, even though they aren't related to what Q says, and often contradict him… Does this make sense?

 

So, Q is "chan" as far as having chan talking points spewed at him– and is IDENTIFIED with “chans” by the MSM narrative (which says that Q is "some chan guy"), BUT, from this end, Q is in fact HATED by 4chan. The anons hate Q! But the anons follow Q, and the anons ARE Q!

 

Is ANY of that believably organic?

Is 4chan controlled?

 

But we IMITATE 4chan here… so are we insane, or also controlled?

 

Everything is infiltrated

 

Well, what form does that take? What controls this board? Did our enemies seek control with their massive data, massive AI investment, and massive penetration (vault 7)? Is that infiltration?

THINK: How can Q have it both ways– both identified with the chans, and hated by the chans– getting the WORST of both sides? Is one side or the other fake, or are they BOTH fake?

 

Will PEOPLE wake up and question what is going on, or what?

 

I repeat: “Q is some chan guy” is the MSM talking point– now look at all the unrealistically overdone “chan culture” spewing that gets pushed here, and keeps the threads flying by– is that strongly REINFORCING this false MSM narrative? Look at the “band of anons” “this is /qresearch” video– same thing. Pushing the image of wacky, autistic, infantile, yet somehow mystical and magical (yet scary and intimidating if you try to come here!) “anons”–and fully identifying Q with that; it FITS the MSM narrative– and serves no other purpose.

 

EVERY ASPECT of what goes on on the “chans” is rigged against Q.

 

How could this be?

Anonymous ID: f6c264 Feb. 18, 2019, 8:01 a.m. No.5242228   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2255

>>5242200

>Look at the “band of anons” “this is /qresearch” video

What is this video? Patriots “explaining the Q board”?

Or is this something being used to push a narrative

onto patriots? Did "chan culture" create Q? That is

the MSM narrative, and that is what this video

reinforces, strongly.

BEWARE. BE VERY WARE.

I apologize for posting this again, bot system, since

I know it makes you mad. But I believe the people

need to know the truth about the ways in which

narrative is seized and dominated by fakeness

 

https://youtu.be/GClSLT18S5Y

Anonymous ID: f6c264 Feb. 18, 2019, 8:06 a.m. No.5242313   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5242227

THINK PEOPLE

Is breitbart "the other side"?

Think levels and layers.

If you can paint a whole picture, with an "us" and a "them", then whatever falls outside the picture DOESN'T EXIST, for those that trust the picture.

What does this story picture for us?

What DOESN'T EXIST?

Anonymous ID: f6c264 Feb. 18, 2019, 8:10 a.m. No.5242378   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5242200

Let's look at some of the posts on this 4chan "Q hate thread". Let's ask ourselves if they are organic, and if we see THE VERY SAME POSTS being made here.

Anonymous (ID: QkharLh5) 02/14/19(Thu)14:39:18 No.203177396▶

>>203177283 (OP)

>Q

unless you're a drooling boomer no one gives a fuck about this Q shit

>>

Anonymous (ID: XIIcSydQ) 02/14/19(Thu)14:39:37 No.203177434▶

Nah dude the tribunals started in January. Some dude said so on twitter.

>>

Anonymous (ID: ieuPmulu) 02/14/19(Thu)14:40:18 No.203177495▶

Q is a Zionist.

 

First three posts, three picture-perfect standard "chan" poses or talking points 1. "boomers" (simple division tactic); 2. sarcastic dismissal; 3. link to zionism/"the jew"/etc.

Do we see all of those very same posts here at times? Certainly.

So remember, Q is identified strongly with chans, yet was run off the main chan, and is hated by enough anons there to keep him off that board…

AND YET

Those same "anons" that hate Q over on 4chan enough to drive him out ("that chan guy Q" per MSM) from the board, also exist in such numbers that they somehow stalk Q here and make THE SAME POSTS HERE…

THINK ABOUT IT

Where are all these "anons" coming from?

Because in theory, if Q is so controversial on "the chans" he should have SPLIT THEM– but has he? As far as bickering, we are told he has, but if the chans were split, THERE WOULD BE A BIG DROP IN ACTIVITY between here and 4chan, as the two sides divided.

Instead, IT AS IF THE CHANS MULTIPLIED.

And a huge volume of "anons" stayed on 4chan (keeping Q out, among other things), and massive swarms also are here. And strangest of all, the two "cultures" ARE PRACTICALLY IDENTICAL! How could this possibly be organic? Not like a split, but again, like a multiplication. A doubling– a mirroring…

Use logic friends.

Meanwhile, look at how insidious and overwhelming the fakeness is

>"Q is a zionist"

The whole mainstream public thinks that "chans and Q is antisemitic"– but in fact, on the "chans" themselves, it is, once again, HAD BOTH WAYS– because Q and Trump are also attacked WITH BEING TOO "JEWISH" from the antisemitic attitude that is fake anyway.