You're muchly appreciated, baker :)

From a political standing, POTUS has to be seen to do something, and seen to be all for it. If he does nothing he will lose a good deal of his approval rating and, likely votes for not only himself but for other repubs in upcoming elections. If he doesn't give a little on this, in the face of all the current media persuasion of the masses, we may all lose out.

He either needs to play the game and bend a little to maintain votes, or we could lose his positioning altogether and end up with the Dems running the show.

Does that make sense from a political perspective?

>>524794

I honestly think that sometimes people converse with them because they're bored and/or lonely.

Mot much digging being shared this morning.

>>524873

I have to disagree, anon. I think we are a necessary element in the story line. We most certainly need that 'outrage' to pull it off.

'PUBLIC is VITAL.

RELEASE of INFO VITAL.

OUTRAGE.

JUSTICE.

Can we simply arrest the opposition w/o first exposing the TRUTH?

FOLLOW THE LIGHT.'

>>524913

Ah, sounds like great stuff that I have no understanding of. (Not sure why you tagged me). But, keep fighting the good fight, anon.