There's documentation out there saying he's got some skeletons in the closet in this area.
The text:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
That part about the well regulated Militia leaves room for there to be regulation of gun rights. But my impression is that current gun regulation laws aren't being followed properly as it is. Plus, taking guns does not work for eliminating these crimes; rather, it declares open season for those who obtain them illegally.
Russia is training their kids to defend themselves, apparently. I think this is a great idea.
http:// www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2497.htm
What shooter would want to take on a school that has its own militia?
It costs money not to now.
Dossey has good data. Also, look at McTaggart. The latter was actually quite surprised when her experiments proved an effect. She wasn't expecting that.
No idea about hope. I have ideas on who at least one of them is. Hint was in a Q post. But since we don't dox here, you'll have to go find it yourself.
Bye!
I agree. It's the reason I allowed myself to be drawn into this work as deeply as I have been. My normal activities were quite different. I wasn't even all that concerned about politics until a couple years ago. Here, I've been collating. Not an easy task when more is added every day. I keep improving my tool set, and I'm getting more efficient at it.
I do avoid bashing. At the same time, at some point they need to jump off that high dive and get it done. Maybe they're waiting for the perfect conditions when good enough is sufficient?
In my case, it's because I'm tired of working with the data and need a break with like minded people. I can't work and be here at the same time. It's that simple. But right now, the computer is busy reparsing threads. Stuff wasn't linking up properly while contexting things, and yet I had the thread.
My neighborhood feels safer than that. But I am seriously considering running away from home and living with out of state relatives for a while.
I have the impression that military justice is entirely outside the DOJ system. So, no, they may not need Sessions. POTUS said he'd be needed later. But I also get the impression that Sessions recusing himself from the Russiagate stuff was not part of the plan.
For the last several hours, I've been watching my computer crank through a reparse of the threads. It must be worth it because it just found as I'm writing this some posts it hadn't parsed before. Hopefully contexting goes a bit better after this.
If you're wondering why it's taking so long, it's because the computer has to rest 4 minutes between each set of about 10 threads for the system to release its connections. I've got things set to cycle through automatically without any input from me. Automatic rest and restart is a new feature in my tools as of today.
OG? Not sure what that is. I've been archiving threads most days. Last archives were done this evening.
Depends. POTUS threatened to pull people out of CA.
The breads provide good hints on what to include.
Yes, beginning with a point of agreement is a good strategy. All the same, it will be difficult to keep from jumping for joy.
Some of my favorite YouTube channels are gone now. I like to have stuff playing while I'm doing some of the less challenging work on the posts.
Drake, in that old Wilcock interview, seemed to think the military option was ultimately the only way, but I did not get the impression that it would be lengthy or interfere much with the average citizen. But we should have essentials on hand in the event that the supply chain failed during those activities.
Looks like a 4chan post. What board was this?
Just shared this. Wow!
Not sure which is worse.
No, definitely not a game. This crew is in serious trouble if the plan fails. I believe it will ultimately succeed, though.
Found it. I'll be scraping it later.