>>5244738

Constitutional definition of Treason

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

>>5244776

>>5244825

As Q suggested, that is not how the Constitution defines Treason.

Granted, your graphic originally was posted by Q but, apparently, attorneys have studied how these people are going to be charged and they have not met the definition of Treason.

The interesting question for NO NAME and his ilk who appear to have been aiding/financing/supporting foreign armies against American soldiers is that our country has had competing foreign policies for decades.

NO NAME's attorney would argue that he was supporting the stated foreign policy of the United States BUT WHAT THEY MEAN IS the foreign policy of the SWAMP.

For decades it just so happened that the foreign policy of the SWAMP was almost exactly the foreign policy of the elected government.

However, once TRUMP was elected POTUS the disparity between his foreign policy goals and the de facto (SWAMP) foreign policy is evident.

If TRUMP is not removed then THE PEOPLE will begin to ask:

WHO IS IN CHARGE OF THIS FUCKING COUNTRY?

Our Constitution says one thing. Reality says another.

>>5244844

Treason as defined by the Constitution:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

>>5245123

They all took part in a conspiracy to subvert the elected President in order to remove him and/or ensure that his policies never see the light of day. In essence, not allowing POTUS to exercise his Constitutional authority, responsibility and duty by way of constant investigation, negative inference and ultimately removal.

>>5245154

I read that too.

It means you cannot take the Clinton Foundation away from Chelsea just because her parents were crooks.

You can bankrupt the foundation and you can charge Chelsea for crimes (she is an officer of the CF) but you cannot just take it as did the English crown.

>>5245162

When Christopher Steele is the source for the Yahoo story about the allegations in the piss dossier it is called CIRCULAR REPORTING.

The source was used to 'verify' the claims of the Yahoo story.

BUT

When the Fake News media ALLEGES that RBG has returned and ALL OTHER NEWS OUTLETS RUN WITH THE UNSUPPORTED ALLEGATION which uses a photo from an event in November 2018 as PROOF OF LIFE we are told that we are conspiracy nutters for demanding actual evidence.

Remember, a FoxNews story which cites the original story that RBG appeared THAT IS NOT REPORTING.

IT IS CIRCULAR ARGUMENT

IT IS PROPAGANDA

I will accept if RBG speaks on camera with POTUS that she is alive.

But trust your 'reporting'b

HELL NO