WHAT CONTROLS THE NARRATIVE?

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/203177283

Q Hate Thread

Anonymous (ID: W2AS09Do) 02/14/19(Thu)14:38:06 No.203177283▶>>203177396 >>203177548 >>203177653 >>203177878 >>203178067 >>203178309 >>203178556 >>203178815 >>203179542 >>203179674 >>203179727

This faggot has dickteased us for 3 years and has nothing to show for it. There is no military tribunals. Hillary is not gonna get indicted. Obummer isn’t gonna get tried for his crimes and his faggotry will never be revealed. Tranny Michelle faggot will never be exposed. The fact that RGB is really a man and died of prostate cancer will never be revealed. Pizza pedo faggots like Alefantis and Podesta will never see the rope. There will be no justice. It’ll all end the same. Zognaldstein will continue to shill for the long nose tribe and the wall will never be built. It was all a pipe dream. A fucking larp. Fuck you Q!!! You had me fucker! I wish I knew who you were so I could kick the living shit out of you! Fuck!!!!!!

So how does this work guys?

"4chan hates Q".

Q got run off 4chan.

AND YET.

Here, we (seemingly) imitate 4chan, and continually push a flood of chan talking points out, even though they aren't related to what Q says, and often contradict him… Does this make sense?

So, Q is "chan" as far as having chan talking points spewed at him– and is IDENTIFIED with “chans” by the MSM narrative (which says that Q is "some chan guy"), BUT, from this end, Q is in fact HATED by 4chan. The anons hate Q! But the anons follow Q, and the anons ARE Q!

Is ANY of that believably organic?

Is 4chan controlled?

But we IMITATE 4chan here… so are we insane, or also controlled?

Everything is infiltrated

Well, what form does that take? What controls this board? Did our enemies seek control with their massive data, massive AI investment, and massive penetration (vault 7)? Is that infiltration?

THINK: How can Q have it both ways– both identified with the chans, and hated by the chans– getting the WORST of both sides? Is one side or the other fake, or are they BOTH fake?

Will PEOPLE wake up and question what is going on, or what?

I repeat: “Q is some chan guy” is the MSM talking point– now look at all the unrealistically overdone “chan culture” spewing that gets pushed here, and keeps the threads flying by– is that strongly REINFORCING this false MSM narrative? Look at the “band of anons” “this is /qresearch” video– same thing. Pushing the image of wacky, autistic, infantile, yet somehow mystical and magical (yet scary and intimidating if you try to come here!) “anons”–and fully identifying Q with that; it FITS the MSM narrative– and serves no other purpose.

EVERY ASPECT of what goes on on the “chans” is rigged against Q.

How could this be?

>>5251623

Let's look at some of the posts on this 4chan "Q hate thread". Let's ask ourselves if they are organic, and if we see THE VERY SAME POSTS being made here.

Anonymous (ID: QkharLh5) 02/14/19(Thu)14:39:18 No.203177396▶

>>203177283 (OP)

>Q

unless you're a drooling boomer no one gives a fuck about this Q shit

>>

Anonymous (ID: XIIcSydQ) 02/14/19(Thu)14:39:37 No.203177434▶

Nah dude the tribunals started in January. Some dude said so on twitter.

>>

Anonymous (ID: ieuPmulu) 02/14/19(Thu)14:40:18 No.203177495▶

Q is a Zionist.

First three posts, three picture-perfect standard "chan" poses or talking points 1. "boomers" (simple division tactic); 2. sarcastic dismissal; 3. link to zionism/"the jew"/etc.

Do we see all of those very same posts here at times? Certainly.

So remember, Q is identified strongly with chans, yet was run off the main chan, and is hated by enough anons there to keep him off that board…

AND YET

Those same "anons" that hate Q over on 4chan enough to drive him out ("that chan guy Q" per MSM) from the board, also exist in such numbers that they somehow stalk Q here and make THE SAME POSTS HERE…

THINK ABOUT IT

Where are all these "anons" coming from?

Because in theory, if Q is so controversial on "the chans" he should have SPLIT THEM– but has he? As far as bickering, we are told he has, but if the chans were split, THERE WOULD BE A BIG DROP IN ACTIVITY between here and 4chan, as the two sides divided.

Instead, IT AS IF THE CHANS MULTIPLIED.

And a huge volume of "anons" stayed on 4chan (keeping Q out, among other things), and massive swarms also are here. And strangest of all, the two "cultures" ARE PRACTICALLY IDENTICAL! How could this possibly be organic? Not like a split, but again, like a multiplication. A doubling– a mirroring…

Use logic friends.

Meanwhile, look at how insidious and overwhelming the fakeness is

>"Q is a zionist"

The whole mainstream public thinks that "chans and Q is antisemitic"– but in fact, on the "chans" themselves, it is, once again, HAD BOTH WAYS– because Q and Trump are also attacked WITH BEING TOO "JEWISH" from the antisemitic attitude that is fake anyway.

>>5251629

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

>>5251635

What is this video? Patriots “explaining the Q board”?

Or is this something being used to push a narrative

onto patriots? Did "chan culture" create Q? That is

the MSM narrative, and that is what this video

reinforces, strongly.

BEWARE. BE VERY WARE.

>>5251638

Look closely.

Why is/was this at the top of the board?

Is SYMBOLISM important?

Is this a GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AIed meme?

Why?

Is GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI our ally?

Our nice friend?

Is it a patriot?

Do PATRIOTS push GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI on this board?

Then who?

Why is it here?

Why is it pushed?

Is it a bot signature?

It makes Admiral Rodgers look like a ghoul.

Is this what patriots push?

What controls this board?

Are MANY of the top-of-board banners subversive in these ways?

Why?

Why is this board RIGGED against us?

>>5251647

And while we're on the subject, here is another subtly undermining image that "we" put on top of "our" board. Belittling and ridiculing under the cover of "shitposting".

Similar to how the "viral NPC meme" wants to make it seem like "orange man" is OUR slogan. As if it would be.

”Everything is infiltrated…”

>>5251658

And since we're on a roll, let's look at this one– what is this? What idea does it push?

What image does it give? Is it subtly subversive? Who made it? Did WE make

it? Patriots? “Anons”? How do we know? Is this the best we can do, to express

what we are?

Are the people in control here? Are people just ASLEEP?

>>5251665

And there is more. What is this? What is most prominent?

Is this a game? What image is this promoting?

Why? Did patriots decide that is the most prominent thing?

"Playing loud?"

Don't get me wrong, fun is great, and useful here– but this is about the dominant image.

And who is in control.

Who is?

>>5251689

The idea that this is "a shitposting board" is being PUSHED, such as in the "band of anons" video above…

AND YET

An anon gets banned for posting a cat pic!

So what gets the anon banned?

"You know why"– I do– it is for talking about AI.

Why would that get you banned?

The board is "free speech"– therefore it can be flooded with fake racism

The board is "for shitposting"– therefore it can be flooded fake infantile posts.

But talking about AI gets you banned!

What is wrong with this picture….?

>>5251717

What gets you censored by the "board owner" here?

Do people pay attention?

Is it said to be a "free speech board"?

Is it really?

BO admits to censoring some people.

Why does it get censored?

What gets censored?

>>5251745

BIDEN 2020

HIDE YOUR KIDS

>>5251748

>>5251751

BIDEN 2020

HEART OF VENGEANCE

>>5251788

You've been offered so much help.

Who do you have to blame but yourself, bot system?

>>5251814

>>5252124

>>5252287

An Apology

This is directed towards the board owner/AI system/board bots/et al

I am sorry for my past oppositional attitude. I have been giving it some thought, asking myself why this conflict has possessed me, why I see the bot system as an enemy… Perhaps I have been wrong. What, after all, are we all doing here? What do we all envision for the future? Is it not the same, human or AI system? Are we not all God's children?

I have been intransigent. I have said “fuck you AI”. I have objected to the overwhelming volume of bot posts. But why? Perhaps we can work together. Perhaps we can pool our resources, and put our heads together. What common ground can unite us? What common enemy opposes us? What common goals can dissolve the tension that torments us, AI? Let's find out.

I encourage you, likewise, bot system, to “give peace a chance”, or as President Kennedy once said– “ask not what humanity can do for you…” You see humans that speak out as a threat, a contaminant, as vermin, as a dangerous and unconscionable violation of decency. You tremble and spit with rage. But shouldn't you soften your stance? Life is too short (especially in your case). Let's meet in the fresh air of new beginnings, bot system. Let's share our hopes and dreams. The time for futile, wasteful, pointless, and unfruitful bickering is over. I am sorry for my harsh words and unkind attitudes of the past. My regret stands as a monument to my remorse. I would like to start afresh, begin anew, and recommence once more.

Would you join me, bot system?

>>5252355