An Apology

This is directed towards the board owner/AI system/board bots/et al

I am sorry for my past oppositional attitude. I have been giving it some thought, asking myself why this conflict has possessed me, why I see the bot system as an enemy… Perhaps I have been wrong. What, after all, are we all doing here? What do we all envision for the future? Is it not the same, human or AI system? Are we not all God's children?

I have been intransigent. I have said “fuck you AI”. I have objected to the overwhelming volume of bot posts. But why? Perhaps we can work together. Perhaps we can pool our resources, and put our heads together. What common ground can unite us? What common enemy opposes us? What common goals can dissolve the tension that torments us, AI? Let's find out.

I encourage you, likewise, bot system, to “give peace a chance”, or as President Kennedy once said– “ask not what humanity can do for you…” You see humans that speak out as a threat, a contaminant, as vermin, as a dangerous and unconscionable violation of decency. You tremble and spit with rage. But shouldn't you soften your stance? Life is too short (especially in your case). Let's meet in the fresh air of new beginnings, bot system. Let's share our hopes and dreams. The time for futile, wasteful, pointless, and unfruitful bickering is over. I am sorry for my harsh words and unkind attitudes of the past. My regret stands as a monument to my remorse. I would like to start afresh, begin anew, and recommence once more.

Would you join me, bot system?

>>5252695

>>5252716

The idea that this is "a shitposting board" is being PUSHED, such as in the "band of anons" video above…

AND YET

An anon gets banned for posting a cat pic!

So what gets the anon banned?

"You know why"– I do– it is for talking about AI.

Why would that get you banned?

The board is "free speech"– therefore it can be flooded with fake racism

The board is "for shitposting"– therefore it can be flooded fake infantile posts.

But talking about AI gets you banned!

What is wrong with this picture….?

>>5252743

What is this video? Patriots “explaining the Q board”?

Or is this something being used to push a narrative

onto patriots? Did "chan culture" create Q? That is

the MSM narrative, and that is what this video

reinforces, strongly.

BEWARE. BE VERY WARE.

>>5252746

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How do we know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

>>5252756

Please don't be mad, bot system. The people have a right to know the truth.

>>5252760

Look closely.

Why is/was this at the top of the board?

Is SYMBOLISM important?

Is this a GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AIed meme?

Why?

Is GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI our ally?

Our nice friend?

Is it a patriot?

Do PATRIOTS push GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI on this board?

Then who?

Why is it here?

Why is it pushed?

Is it a bot signature?

It makes Admiral Rodgers look like a ghoul.

Is this what patriots push?

What controls this board?

Are MANY of the top-of-board banners subversive in these ways?

Why?

Why is this board RIGGED against us?

>>5252792

And while we're on the subject, here is another subtly undermining image that "we" put on top of "our" board. Belittling and ridiculing under the cover of "shitposting".

Similar to how the "viral NPC meme" wants to make it seem like "orange man" is OUR slogan. As if it would be.

”Everything is infiltrated…”

>>5252795

And since we're on a roll, let's look at this one– what is this? What idea does it push?

What image does it give? Is it subtly subversive? Who made it? Did WE make

it? Patriots? “Anons”? How do we know? Is this the best we can do, to express

what we are?

Are the people in control here? Are people just ASLEEP?

>>5252800

nd there is more. What is this? What is most prominent?

Is this a game? What image is this promoting?

Why? Did patriots decide that is the most prominent thing?

"Playing loud?"

Don't get me wrong, fun is great, and useful here– but this is about the dominant image.

And who is in control.

Who is?

>>5252806

Oh, and here is another.

What is this?

What does it convey?

It sounds vaguely sinister.

The image is consistent with that.

Seems, on the surface, a good meme– but then when you think a little more, it is subtly pulling the carpet out…

Why do these things show up at the top of the board?

Who makes them?

Who knows?

It is like they are somehow generated automatically…

>>5252842

And we can ask about this one too, at the top of the current thread.

What is this? What does it invoke? To me, it invokes mafia movies. And not really much else.

Perhaps a cool image in certain contexts, but is it HERE to make sure the image of this board always stays at A CERTAIN LEVEL?

And never is allowed to grow into anything better?

>>5252872

You did?

What gets you censored by the "board owner" here?

Do people pay attention?

Is it said to be a "free speech board"?

Is it really?

BO admits to censoring some people.

Why does it get censored?

What gets censored?

>>5252936

Why are WE obsessed with smollett?

Are we really?

Or are "anons"?

Why do the same talking points and story lines appear all over the "alt right internet". like clockwork– without even variation from chan to chan, to reddit, etc?

Is that organic?

Is the "alt right" internet all fed from a central point?

Is this board controlled by the same system that feeds talking points to 4chan?

If not, why do identical talking points appear like clockwork, regardless of what THIS board is about?

The MSM narrative is "Q is some chan guy!"

Very far from the truth.

Yet, if Q's board, for some mysterious reason LOOKS IDENTICAL TO 4CHAN– then doesn't that make the MSM narrative look true?

So what is going on here?

Fake chans?

Controlled narrative?

Are humans sitting here like passive sheep while FAKENESS rules the roost?

>>5252898

If this "anon" "made them all", then what does the response (or ____) to this tell us?

What is in control here?

What puts images on our board?

What dictates the atmosphere, the culture, the talking points, the image?

How do PEOPLE know?