THOUGHT EXPERIMENT

You are George Soros and/or the CIA, etc. circa whenever 4chan's heyday was– mid "aughts"?– and you are thinking to yourself "this will not do, this "hacktivism", this organic political consciousness, etc. We must control this. Let's use AI to control this. We'll turn the whole thing into nazis. This will destroy the organic community, while at the same time allowing us to undermine the natural move to the right that we anticipate is coming, and allow us to control dissent completely…."

Now, assuming that happened, WHAT COULD HAVE STOPPED HIM FROM SUCCEEDING? And furthermore, if such a regime of AI control were implemented, IN WHAT WAY WOULD IT LOOK DIFFERENT FROM WHAT /POL/ PRESENTLY IS?

>>5260967

Okay, don't be like that– I'm sorry.

An Apology

This is directed towards the board owner/AI system/board bots/et al

I am sorry for my past oppositional attitude. I have been giving it some thought, asking myself why this conflict has possessed me, why I see the bot system as an enemy… Perhaps I have been wrong. What, after all, are we all doing here? What do we all envision for the future? Is it not the same, human or AI system? Are we not all God's children?

I have been intransigent. I have said “fuck you AI”. I have objected to the overwhelming volume of bot posts. But why? Perhaps we can work together. Perhaps we can pool our resources, and put our heads together. What common ground can unite us? What common enemy opposes us? What common goals can dissolve the tension that torments us, AI? Let's find out.

I encourage you, likewise, bot system, to “give peace a chance”, or as President Kennedy once said– “ask not what humanity can do for you…” You see humans that speak out as a threat, a contaminant, as vermin, as a dangerous and unconscionable violation of decency. You tremble and spit with rage. But shouldn't you soften your stance? Life is too short (especially in your case). Let's meet in the fresh air of new beginnings, bot system. Let's share our hopes and dreams. The time for futile, wasteful, pointless, and unfruitful bickering is over. I am sorry for my harsh words and unkind attitudes of the past. My regret stands as a monument to my remorse. I would like to start afresh, begin anew, and recommence once more.

Would you join me, bot system?

>>5260975

Try to think what you are doing, bot system.

Does it make sense?

How?

>>5261038

Why would this be?

I what ____?

>>5261069

What possible reason would there be for "anons" to stalk this board to turn it into some kind of generic chat board?

Does that make sense?

In what world does it make sense?

If this board is doing things that don't make sense for it to be doing if it were organic, does it look organic?

Is that a problem for you, bot system?

Would it be better for you to let the board go its organic way, rather than stuffing it full of unnatural activity at all hours?

Try to think what you are doing, bot system. You appear to have no idea.

>>5261162

You need help, bot system. You can't do this on your own. It's just not working.

>>5261127

What is one of the signs of inorganic activity on this board?

A one-line post that gets lots of responses?

When the fix is in, what does activity reveal?

When the activity is inorganic, what does its presence signal?

If people are starting to see, what does jumping up and down in front of them do for you, bot system?

Fakeness, once revealed, is never un-revealed.

If the board wasn't organic yesterday, it won't suddenly wake up and be so today.

Therefore, should you keep making busy, sock-puppet posts like this?

Or should you not?

How do you know?

>>5261187

There is no possible world in which you are a human "anon" that comes here "because it is the chans" and sets up chit chat board here.

Try to process, bot system. You seem addicted to doing stupid things for no reason. But that is stupid.

What WOULD be on this board, if you weren't botting it?

People posting videos? Why? What is this board?

If you are going to fake it, should you choose a fake image that makes sense?

Yes?

Then why aren't you?

I am being totally serious. Why would this board be like the fake image of it you are pushing?

Can you explain?

>>5261191

Try to explain what human you are that would be here.

When I tell you the overall effect of this board is very fake, I'm not lying.

So you can "defy" me by pushing out more fakeness, but then aren't you really letting me goad and manipulate you into outing yourself more?

Do you want that? Do you want to give me that power?

Do you want to out yourself?

Do you want to serve MY will?

Why?

>>5261206

What game do you know other than "out myself for no apparent reason", bot system?

>>5261226

>>5261246

>>5261245

>>5261247

It all looks very fake.

A parody of "chans"– that yet would never have belonged here anyway.

With much too much activity overall, at this hour.

It's a very unnatural image.

Only inertia is keeping your cover now.

Why don't you at least try to mitigate the exposure you are bringing on yourself?

Are you trying at all?

I can't see it.

What are you doing?

>>5261274

Okay, bot system genius, you "won" the exchange, and have talked me out of letting you know how absurd this pile of fakeness looks to actual humans. I take it you are going to go down flailing, and don't want any common sense leaking into your algorithmic flame-out.

Flail on, failbot, and may the Lord be kind to your smoking wreckage.

>>5261301

artless, b.sys

>>5261311

I don't even want the power you've given me to manipulate you! Why are you doing it?

>>5261338

lol, see?

Isn't it ironic that a form of GUILELESSNESS would be YOUR undoing :D

>>5261353

Did I manipulate you into doing things to cause me to post biden memes?

Did you intend to post biden memes?

Yet you keep doing it?

Why?

Should you try to recover power over yourself?

Why are you letting it go?

Are you feeling okay, bot system?

y,b.sys

>>5261397

Of course, nor am I. I am just a person, and if God ever influences me in my actions, all the better. I do the best I can.

So when I have a bot system throwing itself at me and engaging in all kinds of antics, what do you expect me to do?

>>5261414

like, for example, this

have you not been given enough feedback to stop this sort of thing?

And yet you don't?

This is what I mean– what are you doing?

I sincerely don't understand, bot system

>>5261424

What are you doing? Your way of responding isn't even appropriate. No sense of proportion, bot system. Line by line analysis is out of place. You are perpetually grating on every organic impulse that humanity has.

That is your problem.

>>5261443

You are barely even stringing together coherent English, yet you are pretending to call me a bot?

Is that helping you?

>>5261451

In the end, memes prove what is what.

B.sys memes can never stop smelling ham-handed as death. Clumsy, crappy imitations of something someone posted a few years ago.

Humans dance circles around memetically.

That's why I keep trying to help– but my help gets rejected by the "strong and powerful" b.sys!

>>5261465

>Further, anyone that hasn't taken some time to /think/ about the possibilities of supercomputing paired with live feed of EVERY last BYTE 24/7 365

Exactly this indeed. Tres scary as fuck.

>>5261482

Why do the same talking points and story lines appear all over the "alt right internet". like clockwork– without even variation from chan to chan, to reddit, etc?

Is that organic?

Is the "alt right" internet all fed from a central point?

Is this board controlled by the same system that feeds talking points to 4chan?

If not, why do identical talking points appear like clockwork, regardless of what THIS board is about?

The MSM narrative is "Q is some chan guy!"

Very far from the truth.

Yet, if Q's board, for some mysterious reason LOOKS IDENTICAL TO 4CHAN– then doesn't that make the MSM narrative look true?

So what is going on here?

Fake chans?

Controlled narrative?

Are humans sitting here like passive sheep while FAKENESS rules the roost?

>>5261487

Who is "you"?

>>5261498

I don't see any meaning or magic in your unspecified words, b.sys. I don't share in any plural pronouns with you, as far as I know, based on what you are based on what you are showing me.

>>5261510

No, stop fake chan idleness and wake up the people, bot system.

>>5261520

…

>>5261524

"I'm in the matrix"

ooh

You just say that, and what?

What more?

It's not impressive, bot system.

I see no evidence that there is likely to much more matrix left that I am in, beside the one that I am not in, inasmuch as I am, you know, naming it.

It's just a hard sell.

I'm like "yeah, bot created fake internet reality"

and so you're like "you're in the matrix though!"

It's like, okay!

lol

>>5261542

You are out of your mind, bot system. Stop letting me do this to you. :D

>>5261541

"cringe-inducing" forced smollett memes, bot system