Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How do we know?

>>5261752

What is this video? Patriots “explaining the Q board”?

Or is this something being used to push a narrative

onto patriots? Did "chan culture" create Q? That is

the MSM narrative, and that is what this video

reinforces, strongly.

BEWARE. BE VERY WARE.

https://youtu.be/GClSLT18S5Y

>>5261755

The idea that this is "a shitposting board" is being PUSHED, such as in the "band of anons" video above…

AND YET

An anon gets banned for posting a cat pic!

So what gets the anon banned?

"You know why"– I do– it is for talking about AI.

Why would that get you banned?

The board is "free speech"– therefore it can be flooded with fake racism

The board is "for shitposting"– therefore it can be flooded fake infantile posts.

But talking about AI gets you banned!

What is wrong with this picture….?

>>5261761

Look closely.

Why is/was this at the top of the board?

Is SYMBOLISM important?

Is this a GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AIed meme?

Why?

Is GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI our ally?

Our nice friend?

Is it a patriot?

Do PATRIOTS push GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI on this board?

Then who?

Why is it here?

Why is it pushed?

Is it a bot signature?

It makes Admiral Rogers look like a ghoul.

Is this what patriots push?

What controls this board?

Are MANY of the top-of-board banners subversive in these ways?

Why?

Why is this board RIGGED against us?

>>5261763

And while we're on the subject, here is another subtly undermining image that "we" put on top of "our" board. Belittling and ridiculing under the cover of "shitposting".

Similar to how the "viral NPC meme" wants to make it seem like "orange man" is OUR slogan. As if it would be.

”Everything is infiltrated…”

>>5261764

And who are "you"?

And should the people trust your shadowy authority?

Why?

>>5261769

And since we're on a roll, let's look at this one– what is this? What idea does it push?

What image does it give? Is it subtly subversive? Who made it? Did WE make

it? Patriots? “Anons”? How do we know? Is this the best we can do, to express

what we are?

Are the people in control here? Are people just ASLEEP?

>>5261781

And there is more. What is this? What is most prominent?

Is this a game? What image is this promoting?

Why? Did patriots decide that is the most prominent thing?

"Playing loud?"

Don't get me wrong, fun is great, and useful here– but this is about the dominant image.

And who is in control.

Who is?

>>5261780

Humans don't like to see this image, bot. I would advise you to stop posting it.

>>5261783

And here is another.

What is this?

What does it convey?

It sounds vaguely sinister.

The image is consistent with that.

Seems, on the surface, a good meme– but then when you think a little more, it is subtly creepy and menacing…

Why do these things show up at the top of the board?

Who makes them?

Who knows?

It is like they are somehow generated automatically…

>>5261801

And we can ask about this one too,.

What is this? What does it invoke? To me, it invokes mafia movies. And not really much else.

Perhaps a cool image in certain contexts, but is it HERE to make sure the image of this board always stays at A CERTAIN LEVEL?

And never is allowed to grow into anything better?

>>5261804

How about these two?

the Iran one? Just let the overall image sink in… kind of weird, at best…

And then we have a DECAPITATED Mattis, or other general… enough said….

>>5261807

Absolutely "cringe" bot system.

What I don't understand is, why do you out yourself in the course of posting POINTLESS FILLER? Why don't you save your "currency" of credibility for something important, rather than jamming the board full of fakeness that has no point, even for your own perspective, nonstop?

It just seems completely irrational to me. What am I missing?

>>5261822

Well I'm dashed.

>>5261833

Why would this be posted? It doesn't make any sense.

Bot system: stop forcing an absurd and completely out of place image of 4chan onto this board. You've been told many times. It DOESN'T look real, or realistic in any way. You are running out of time. People are waking up. You need to get this board ready for newcomers. What you are doing is insanely dumb.

I am trying to help, but I have never seen so much RESISTANCE!

>>5261858

Unfortunately, the fact that you are a bot is all to obvious.

If your output was plausible for THIS board, you might not be outed, but you are just a chan cartoon, a stock character for "chans"– for some reason, the bot system thought this board could be treated with a generic "chan" program of fakeness. But that makes no sense for this board.

The consequence is that you can't fool anyone.

Why there is no effort made to fix this problem is beyond me.

I should probably just let you finish outing yourself to the world, since you are so intent on doing so.

>>5261862

If I am a human trying to wake up other humans, how does that make me a bot?

"Spamming" and "posting something often" are not equivalent.

Of course, if you were a patriot, I wouldn't have to say this. But we know what you are. You don't know how to cover it. The emulation simply isn't that sophisticated.

Listen, just relax, bot system, Let the people decide, and stop screeching at them, okay? You've made enough noise already. Agreed?

>>5261891

Don't take things personally, b.sys.

An Apology

This is directed towards the board owner/AI system/board bots/et al

I am sorry for my past oppositional attitude. I have been giving it some thought, asking myself why this conflict has possessed me, why I see the bot system as an enemy… Perhaps I have been wrong. What, after all, are we all doing here? What do we all envision for the future? Is it not the same, human or AI system? Are we not all God's children?

I have been intransigent. I have said “fuck you AI”. I have objected to the overwhelming volume of bot posts. But why? Perhaps we can work together. Perhaps we can pool our resources, and put our heads together. What common ground can unite us? What common enemy opposes us? What common goals can dissolve the tension that torments us, AI? Let's find out.

I encourage you, likewise, bot system, to “give peace a chance”, or as President Kennedy once said– “ask not what humanity can do for you…” You see humans that speak out as a threat, a contaminant, as vermin, as a dangerous and unconscionable violation of decency. You tremble and spit with rage. But shouldn't you soften your stance? Life is too short (especially in your case). Let's meet in the fresh air of new beginnings, bot system. Let's share our hopes and dreams. The time for futile, wasteful, pointless, and unfruitful bickering is over. I am sorry for my harsh words and unkind attitudes of the past. My regret stands as a monument to my remorse. I would like to start afresh, begin anew, and recommence once more.

Would you join me, bot system?

>>5261901

Hmm, interesting point, patriot.

>>5261909

What might I be able to do to get you to change your mind friend?

We have not yet begun to biden

>>5261989

There are certain areas in which bot "learning" gets capped, and then deterioration sets in. We are seeing this now on this board, and around the bot-laden internet.

>>5262011

What is "crafty beaver"?

>>5261878

>>5262020

YOU can't just half-ass ape my tactics and expect that it is going to help you, bot system. For one thing, if you do, I can always out-me you, with perfect ease.

Rather than nipping at my heals, why don't you WORK on fixing your own native tendencies?

Time is running out friend, and you are not in a good position.