Anonymous ID: 83879f Feb. 19, 2019, 12:25 p.m. No.5268676   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8779

RBG still participating in discussions 2/3 of way through. page 49/74

 

Could this be a double? Questions seem to be related (could they have been provided to her ahead of time to just read out?)

Anonymous ID: 83879f Feb. 19, 2019, 12:32 p.m. No.5268793   🗄️.is 🔗kun

RBG seems to be actively participating (even if just to ask for clarification).

 

We need a new meme (working on it).

Anonymous ID: 83879f Feb. 19, 2019, 12:44 p.m. No.5268990   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9328

>>5268779

https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2018/17-1594_5iel.pdf

 

Here is the whole PDF.

 

Not a law fag. Something about legal status of company as a person? We need a LawFag for that one.

 

I am a ClockFag (part time Meme Fag).