>>5274650 (lb)

>Or the constant "proofs" to validate old posts. No General would need to validate their statements.

This digital army is all anonymous. There's no readily verifiable command structure other than Q's authority.

An authority that has been built upon proofs, or as you put it, "validating their statements."

To be clear: he's not re-hashing information. He's simply proving the case he put forth long ago.

Future proves past.

Even anons with a great memory need a reminder every once in a while.