hey fags. does anyone rember last night an Anon posting that SSL certs for this site were mismatched between what they purported in his browser vs. what the values should have been according to a cert authority registry?

He may have been onto something moar bigger.

Q said yesterday that responses were being reviewed and to stay frosty.

here's a possible 2+2 scenario:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-internet-has-bigger-problems-than-facebook-and-its-obamas-fault

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2019/02/a-deep-dive-on-the-recent-widespread-dns-hijacking-attacks/

thanks ssl-anon godspeed everyone

>>5277920

higher level of mitm attack.. not your side. the Root dns nodes (chokepoints) are getting hacked and anything not using dnssec protocol gets sucked in. the dnssec users just get a 404 or some such

>>5278017

well I wrote it because it may be very important this is some sophisticated shit that even woke(security wise) ass oldfag IT guys that take precautions for got blindsided by. hell one of the places for example had 3 dns monitoring services to detect fukkery and none tripped during or after the fact. this is stuxnet level shit.

>>5278393

brotha u read my mind. when I read the krebs report on dns hacks… same time period not same targets however. but red flag was some of the only sources krebs could find that published on it were crowdstrike was 1 of 2. and somewhere in those pubs,–and krebs didn't point to any specifics on that (I think he would have if there were specifics)–, someone is saying muh Persians!. didn't Q say follow Bolton?

>>5278454

wtf?

>>5278468

thanks for the heads up. I was phonefaggin when u posted so couldn't check… but it stuck out and gnawed at me… can we nominate so others can know… I gotta run but those that understand implications need to be made aware