>>5279478

Missed the action in real time but does anyone know whether dead dog anon responded to Q's (you) - that's what one would expect. If there was no response then maybe not all is as seems…

>>5279596

But did anon in need respond to Q's >>5272527 (/pb)?

Anons usually get very excited when Q singles them out with a (you) so I would have expected a thank you Q post or something similar from anon in need.

>>5279615

>>>5272527 (/pb)?

Sorry, not that post. Q's response.

>>5279653

OK. TY. Will look out for it.

Don't want to intrude on any anon's genuine grief but covert comms come in all forms…

Just wondered why Q particularly chose to respond to this anon and why anon didn't acknowledge.

>>5279719

So it's a stock photo from 2005.

That accounts for no head droop.

>>5279831

Agree. A counterfeit has to be very close to the real thing to have any value. Think of counterfeit $ bills. They wouldn't be of much use if they were obviously Monopoly money. Satan's counterfeits are often so subtle that Jesus gave us a specific warning.

Matt 24:24

For there shall arise false christs and false prophets and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

>>5279914

Ok, thanks. So looks genuine.