Hi Baker, I have some questions about baking. Do you have time to answer?
-
How do I delete a practice thread from /comms/?
-
Instructions say "never too early to make a new thread." But if you make it early, isn't that a problem if Q posts? (first page/post contains Q's posts–and that's the one that's a mandatory post for a new thread)
-
Re notable bun, please verify if this is correct:
Insert the post number of the final notable version in the "Notables" page just before adding that page to the new thread, Notable buns are not in the instructions, easy to forget–which I did just now when practicing.
By "getting the thread set up," you don't mean actually creating the thread, right? You mean just having the stuff ready to go?
Coz to actually create the thread, I have to copy/pasta something in to the Content field. And that stuff happens to include Q's posts.
should be Comment field, but what they heck
I watch them too anon. And post on them so they get some kind of coverage. MSM coverage is either non-existent or as negative as they can make it.
I'm already there. But not everything is in the instructions, fren.
Yes. Hard to remain calm watching what goes on and how callously they are treated by the press. The police I don't blame so much, they are caught betwixt and between. But for the press, there is no excuse.
By the way, have you noticed that there are all kinds of people who are supposedly press at the demonstrations? Lots of cameras, visible credentials. So who are these press and why do they never do boots-on-the-ground reporting? (You don't have to answer that, we know. It's just galling.)
Instructions recommend early thread creation. Seems like it's not a good idea, not if Q is posting, because actual thread creation requires text in Comment box. And that text is going to include the list of up-to-date Q posts.
If Q posts during the bread, that first page will not have up to date Q posts. Not unless you wait 'til the end.
Government militarizes the police to turn them against the people. I'm guessing that those who agree to join the ranks of such units are not your usual cop on the beat types, but I really don't know.
Excellent. Here you go.
It does help, thx very much. Confirms my thoughts. Main instructions say make your threads early. This should probably be changed.
Wonder what FDA's motives are. We know they have periodic pograms against vitamins & herbal supplements. They have their GRAS list but don't include herbs etc on that.
Before blood, people were writing about urine therapy. I have a feeling that all therapies involving bodily substances tend to have great potential if properly used, because they human body has energies that are innately healing. So FDA would be against them.
Of course, it's true that we have to know how to use those bodily substances appropriately, and it can be a hit or miss proposition right now since it's outside the mainstream. Q's focus on transparency is dead on the mark, because it's only with transparency (and sincerity) that the culture will allow us to explore the use of natural substances in a way that is truly legitimate.
Moar digging needed on the Institute for Strategic Dialogue
The Daily Beast cites the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, an anti-extremism think-tank", as a primary source here.
The Institute for Strategic Dialogue is new to me, but it's big in Europe, apparently. I just did a post on it last night, all PB:
>>5260465 , >>5260479 , >>5260485, >>5260491 deep info warfare dig
The ISD is friendly with the German Marshall Fund's Alliance for Securing Democracy (all neocons and hawk dems) and the UN.
Their "strong cities" affiliation is 100% Agenda 21. Another anon just posted on this in >>5244367 PB:
" 1) Notice there is an intention NOT to deal (in the USA at least) with “states” but only with cities. So, it’s not Denver, Colorado, USA — or New York City, NY, USA — but only “Denver, USA; New York, USA, or Minneapolis, USA. They want to get rid of the “states” relationship — but in the USA, many of our taxes, protections, and legal rights such as exist, occur under State law. What’s more, many city or municipality budgets are also heavily interdependent on state and federal, as well as influenced by regional funding. The concept of “Strong CITIES” wishes to equalize this across borders, in discord with our form of government.
ISD is probably going to end up on this chart that I made up initially to track New Knowledge. It's strongly affiliated with the Marshall Fund, too. I'll have to figure out exactly where it belongs here.
This is all going to tie into the fake "muh Russia" narrative. Please see the new Information Warfare thread for more about that narrative including the digs done.
Sorry, didn't indicate the end of the anon's quote, did this on the fly. My comments begin against at "ISD is probably…."
thx, see you on the other side