Anonymous ID: f419ea Government Codifying Human Trafficking Feb. 20, 2019, 2:48 a.m. No.5280990   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1038

Q,

 

At first i didnt think much about it. But after listening to yesterdays Rush Limbaugh podcast he talked about the recent bill signed by Trump. He exposes that the bill includes provisions that forces the government agencies to setup reception centers to accept children from the traffickers. What makes it worse is that there is another provision that prevents the government from validating relationships between adults who come and pickup the children left at the reception centers….

 

So my question is. If there are efforts to prevent human/child trafficking and destroy these networks… How can that occur when the uniparty/establishment is officially sanctioning the practice by codifying it in law?

 

https://youtu.be/X2muQdk0hhc?t=4600

Anonymous ID: f419ea Feb. 20, 2019, 2:55 a.m. No.5281007   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1029

>>5281003

 

Public utilities are regulated by government which is what the social platforms want. They want the government shield (china) to censor as wanted.

 

What needs to happen is a law that enforces a public forum such as making political views a protected class. This would prevent the censoring, filtering, economic terrorism performed by corporate entities..

Anonymous ID: f419ea Feb. 20, 2019, 2:59 a.m. No.5281028   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5276932

 

Q,

 

At first i didnt think much about it. But after listening to yesterdays Rush Limbaugh podcast he talked about the recent bill signed by Trump. He exposes that the bill includes provisions that forces the government agencies to setup reception centers to accept children from the traffickers. What makes it worse is that there is another provision that prevents the government from validating relationships between adults who come and pickup the children left at the reception centers….

 

So my question is. If there are efforts to prevent human/child trafficking and destroy these networks… How can that occur when the uniparty/establishment is officially sanctioning the practice by codifying it in law?

 

https://youtu.be/X2muQdk0hhc?t=4600

Anonymous ID: f419ea Feb. 20, 2019, 3:03 a.m. No.5281035   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1041

>>5281029

 

The telecom as a public utility situation served two purposes. Controlling the monopolization of telecom providers, and later forcing those same entities to share data with the government enabling surveillance capabilities.

Anonymous ID: f419ea Feb. 20, 2019, 3:16 a.m. No.5281078   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5281066

 

The "backlash" is only because its being exposed too early. People feel comfortable and are freely acting out their real desires. The real backlash is from normal who do not agree with this. In order to save face, the DNC has to speak out or will be labeled the same.

 

Omar is on the list of people who will have a short lived run.

Anonymous ID: f419ea Feb. 20, 2019, 3:22 a.m. No.5281106   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5281097

 

Mostly just the flip side of the coin.

 

When people finally wake up and realize there is a uniparty, controlled opposition, etc they will realize that voting is becoming less and less fruitful. These people believe in the same agenda. The elite at the top controlling everything and everyone else looking up begging for scraps. You can see it every time they vote against principles for things they claim to be against.

Anonymous ID: f419ea Feb. 20, 2019, 3:25 a.m. No.5281116   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1131 >>1136

>>5281099

 

How do you silence opposition? Discrediting their character. By calling people conspiracy theorist you automatically discount their voice without ever hearing their words.

 

Only when the theories become verifiable undeniable fact, there are risks to being viewed as a fringe.

Anonymous ID: f419ea Feb. 20, 2019, 3:27 a.m. No.5281133   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5281108

 

Mass migration is beneficial to both parties.

 

  1. Votes for the liberal tyranny

  2. Labor for the corporate lobbyist who want to shaft workers through low wages and benefits in order to benefit their controllers.

 

Congressional representation is based on population not number of citizens. Correlate that against sanctuary cities,welfare, law suits,overall actions against the will of the people.

Anonymous ID: f419ea Feb. 20, 2019, 3:35 a.m. No.5281172   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1188 >>1279 >>1580

>>5281136

 

I have similar colleagues. Some are conservatives that buy into the never trump narrative.

 

I have been talking about the whole FISAGate, SpyGate,etc for over a year. I even provided more than enough information to discredit the IC assessment.

 

At the end they always say the same thing…. "You may be right, but until someone gets put in handcuffs and locked up, it does not matter".

 

I have extreme liberal friends who believe in full term abortion, population control, socialism,etc who also refuse to take responsibility for their actions. These same people advocate for government control of things but want to punish the rich to do it. The best part is they are equally against the fed. So i guess there is hope, but people like this suffer from the absolute delusion of victimization. The worse part is some of these people want a "fair" chance but advocate for open borders while hating corporate america.

Anonymous ID: f419ea Feb. 20, 2019, 4:19 a.m. No.5281463   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1472

>>5281395

>(You)

 

Any effort to utilitize/nationalize/etc any platform or service will be used to propagate "dictator trump". Regardless of the details that will be the narrative.