all the creativity goes to finding ways not to cover actual Q content, just the classic talking points and smears…
sending thought police tanks
so what's the clickbait about? not feeding that site
No, it meant things getting messy.
Patriots ready to fight.
The reason why they had to accept POTUS' victory on election night even though it took them by surprise
aaaaw can't cap, just conveniently posting the overhyped link… no thanks, i'll wait, then.
>a new social media platform
to me, the gov could just provide the basic infrastructure - since it was built to backdoor surveillance for everyone, they have most of it already.
US postal service being responsible for mail & comms extended mandate, basically.
Gov provides the skeleton, (somewhat)open-sourced and shared by all platforms, who can then dress it up the way they like: same tech means 100% transferability of messages from one platform to the other, without private companies control on the crucial data
exactly
with you 100%…
>Anyone is sure as hell free to develop new platforms themselves, it’s getting the masses to use them that’s the challenge.
part of all that is admitting the existing defacto monopoly (or more accurately oligopoly): people have a limited number of accounts & platforms they're willing to get into, that's just normal…
Recognize the gov infrastructure, take surveillance away and just re-plug the platforms on the cleaned-up system: people can then chose to stay there or go to new ones, and the shared infrastructure helps keep competition and creativity… anyway, i'm not much on the tech side of it, maybe naive, but the theory at least seems simple enough