Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How would we know?

Does anyone ask?

Or just assume someone else did?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

>>5281947

>>5281951

>>5281959

Are these patriots?

What gets attacked here?

What do "anons" let slide– and what gets them MAD?

Why?

No critical thinking, no discussion– just attempts to silence and enforce narrative/image?

Another example of FAKENESS controlling narrative?:

What is this video? Patriots “explaining the Q board”?

Or is this something being used to push a narrative

onto patriots? Did "chan culture" create Q? That is

the MSM narrative, and that is what this video

reinforces, strongly.

BEWARE. FAKENESS IS EVERYWHERE

https://youtu.be/GClSLT18S5Y

>>5281971

Look closely.

Why is/was this at the top of the board?

Is SYMBOLISM important?

Is this a GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AIed meme?

Why?

Is GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI our ally?

Our nice friend?

Is it a patriot?

Do PATRIOTS push GOOGLE DEEP DREAM AI on this board?

Then who?

Why is it here?

Why is it pushed?

Is it a bot signature?

It makes Admiral Rogers look like a ghoul.

Is this what patriots push?

What controls this board?

Are MANY of the top-of-board banners subversive in these ways?

Why?

Is this board RIGGED against us?

>>5281979

And while we're on the subject, here is another subtly undermining image that "we" put on top of "our" board. Belittling and ridiculing under the cover of "shitposting".

Similar to how the "viral NPC meme" wants to make it seem like "orange man" is OUR slogan. As if it would be.

”Everything is infiltrated?…”

>>5281980

And look at this one– what is this? What idea does it push?

What image does it give? I mean really– cattle? Not even subtle at all.

Who made it? Did WE make it? Patriots? “Anons”? How do we know?

Is this the best we can do, to express what we are? Or even close?

Are the people in control here? Are people just ASLEEP?

>>5281982

And there is more. What is this? What is most prominent?

Is this a game? What image is this promoting?

Why? Did patriots decide that is the most prominent thing?

"Playing loud?"

Don't get me wrong, fun is great, and useful here– but this is about the dominant image.

And who is in control.

Who is?

>>5281986

And consider this one as well.

What is this? What does it invoke? To me, it invokes mafia movies. And not really much else.

Perhaps a cool image in certain contexts, but is it the best representation of the main point of the board? Or is it HERE to make sure the image of this board always stays at A CERTAIN LEVEL?

And never is allowed to grow into anything better?

>>5281989

How about these two?

the Iran one? Just let the overall image sink in… kind of weird, at best…

And then we have a DECAPITATED Mattis, or other general… enough said….

Who controls the image of this board? Patriots?

>>5281996

And let's look at one more.

Is this belittling?

Not even very subtle.

Again with the hair– is that OUR icon?

Is that our "thing"?

Is this an attempt to represent our movement in a good way?

Why is it here?

Who chose it?

How do we know?

Do people know?

What is the keystone?

Does Satan exist?

Does the ‘thought’ of Satan exist?

Who worships Satan?

What is a cult?

Epstein island.

What is a temple?

What occurs in a temple?

Worship?

Why is the temple on top of a mountain?

How many levels might exist below?

What is the significance of the colors, design and symbol above the dome?

Why is this relevant?

Who are the puppet masters?

Have the puppet masters traveled to this island?

When? How often? Why?

“Vladimir Putin: The New World Order Worships Satan”

Q

We must answer this– what is THE keystone…?

>>5281762

Once you understand that you are being deceived, the deceptions jump right out at you.

WHAT CONTROLS THE NARRATIVE?

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/203177283

Q Hate Thread

Anonymous (ID: W2AS09Do) 02/14/19(Thu)14:38:06 No.203177283▶>>203177396 >>203177548 >>203177653 >>203177878 >>203178067 >>203178309 >>203178556 >>203178815 >>203179542 >>203179674 >>203179727

This faggot has dickteased us for 3 years and has nothing to show for it. There is no military tribunals. Hillary is not gonna get indicted. Obummer isn’t gonna get tried for his crimes and his faggotry will never be revealed. Tranny Michelle faggot will never be exposed. The fact that RGB is really a man and died of prostate cancer will never be revealed. Pizza pedo faggots like Alefantis and Podesta will never see the rope. There will be no justice. It’ll all end the same. Zognaldstein will continue to shill for the long nose tribe and the wall will never be built. It was all a pipe dream. A fucking larp. Fuck you Q!!! You had me fucker! I wish I knew who you were so I could kick the living shit out of you! Fuck!!!!!!

So how does this work guys?

"4chan hates Q".

Q got run off 4chan.

AND YET.

Here, we (seemingly) imitate 4chan, and continually push a flood of chan talking points out, even though they aren't related to what Q says, and often contradict him… Does this make sense?

So, Q is "chan" as far as having chan talking points spewed at him– and is IDENTIFIED with “chans” by the MSM narrative (which says that Q is "some chan guy"), BUT, from this end, Q is in fact HATED by 4chan. The anons hate Q! But the anons follow Q, and the anons ARE Q!

Is ANY of that believably organic?

Is 4chan controlled?

But we IMITATE 4chan here… so are we insane, or also controlled?

Everything is infiltrated

Well, what form does that take? What controls this board? Did our enemies seek control with their massive data, massive AI investment, and massive penetration (vault 7)? Is that infiltration?

THINK: How can Q have it both ways– both identified with the chans, and hated by the chans– getting the WORST of both sides? Is one side or the other fake, or are they BOTH fake?

Will PEOPLE wake up and question what is going on, or what?

I repeat: “Q is some chan guy” is the MSM talking point– now look at all the unrealistically overdone “chan culture” spewing that gets pushed here, and keeps the threads flying by– is that strongly REINFORCING this false MSM narrative? Look at the “band of anons” “this is /qresearch” video– same thing. Pushing the image of wacky, autistic, infantile, yet somehow mystical and magical (yet scary and intimidating if you try to come here!) “anons”–and fully identifying Q with that; it FITS the MSM narrative– and serves no other purpose.

EVERY ASPECT of what goes on on the “chans” is rigged against Q.

How could this be?

>>5281763

Don't be shy. An s we r.

>>5282061

What "psy op" are you referring to, and why is that term chosen?

Are you a patriot, by any chance, or more of an "anon"?– you know what I mean

>>5282211

Why don't anons go post on 4chan, and let this board be for patriots? Does that sound like it might be a good idea?

NARRATIVES BEING CREATED AND PUSHED

https://www.mixedmartialarts.com/forums/OtherGround/Why-are-conservatives-so-obsessed-with-Jussie:2763225

This is how narrative is controlled. From the internet. We were asking, right here, why the "alt right" internet all gets fed the same talking points. Here it is at the next stage. Jussie smollett obsession is artificially foisted with heavy bots, then "the alt right internet" all discussess its "smollett obsession"– is all this, while it may be a worthwhile example in many ways, ORGANIC? Is it a relatively very trivial situation?

Is keeping the "alt right internet" focused on relatively trivial things a form of control?