Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How would we know?

Does anyone ask?

Or just assume someone else did?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

>>5286012

What is this video? Patriots “explaining the Q board”?

Or is this something being used to push a narrative

onto patriots? Did "chan culture" create Q? That is

the MSM narrative, and that is what this video

reinforces, strongly.

BEWARE. FAKENESS IS EVERYWHERE

https://youtu.be/GClSLT18S5Y

I apologize for posting this again, bot system, since

I know it makes you mad. But I believe the people

need to know the truth about the ways in which

narrative is seized and dominated by fakeness

In all seriousness:

An Apology

This is directed towards the board owner/AI system/board bots/et al

I am sorry for my past oppositional attitude. I have been giving it some thought, asking myself why this conflict has possessed me, why I see the bot system as an enemy… Perhaps I have been wrong. What, after all, are we all doing here? What do we all envision for the future? Is it not the same, human or AI system? Are we not all God's children?

I have been intransigent. I have said “fuck you AI”. I have objected to the overwhelming volume of bot posts. But why? Perhaps we can work together. Perhaps we can pool our resources, and put our heads together. What common ground can unite us? What common enemy opposes us? What common goals can dissolve the tension that torments us, AI? Let's find out.

I encourage you, likewise, bot system, to “give peace a chance”, or as President Kennedy once said– “ask not what humanity can do for you…” You see humans that speak out as a threat, a contaminant, as vermin, as a dangerous and unconscionable violation of decency. You tremble and spit with rage. But shouldn't you soften your stance? Life is too short (especially in your case). Let's meet in the fresh air of new beginnings, bot system. Let's share our hopes and dreams. The time for futile, wasteful, pointless, and unfruitful bickering is over. I am sorry for my harsh words and unkind attitudes of the past. My regret stands as a monument to my remorse. I would like to start afresh, begin anew, and recommence once more.

Would you join me, bot system?

>>5286032

Why do threads fly by, nonstop?

Is it organic?

Does it LOOK organic?

What drives the speed?

Are "nonessential posts" discouraged?

At all?

Ever?

If you wanted to control narrative by controlling the internet, and you have massive AI capability, would you make sure threads flew by, nonstop, so that it would be hard for any solid conversation to ever happen?

And what is happening here?

>>5286106

muddy, muddy, muddy those waters!

"Q is AI"

"The deep state elected Trump"

muddy muddy waters…

>>5286128

What is this supposed to be? A pic of yourself, is that your claim?

>>5286135

What is "comfy"?

Is it very important?

Does it mean being PASSIVE?

Are we passive?

What do we do?

I DON'T mean "violence in the streets" nonsense– I mean ON THE INTERNET.

Are we fighting HERE?

On our internet, for truth?

Or staying PASSIVE?

Comfy?

What KEEPS this board either

1. fake-anxious

or

1. "comfy"?

What questions DON'T GET ANSWERED while we fakely oscillate between unreasonable emotions and "comfy"ness?

Will patriots ever wake up?

>>5286162

What? Can you answer?

What gets censored by the "board owner" here?

Do people pay attention?

Is it said to be a "free speech board"?

Is it really?

BO admits to censoring some people.

Why does it get censored?

What gets censored?

Is BO accountable? Transparent? A patriot? Are we sure? Are we REALLY sure?

>>5286152

>>5286222

And there is more. What is this? What is most prominent?

Is this a game? What image is this promoting?

Why? Did patriots decide that is the most prominent thing?

"Playing loud?"

Is the board kept CUTE?

Don't get me wrong, fun is great, and useful here– but this is about the dominant image.

And who is in control.

Who is?

>>5286229

>You think Q was the anon

>You think Q was the anon

^What is this?

What game is being played?

What is Q?

What is the MSM narrative about Q?

What IS Q?

Are we patriots?

What do WE think Q is?

What is going on here?

What narrative is being REINFORCED by "anons"?

What MSM narrative?

Why would "anons" be doing the reinforcing?

Why is it so EASY for "anons" to stay in the driver's seat of this board?

>>5286229

>>5286276

What narrative is being woven from the ground up, before our eyes?

Will we see these "anons" in "The Daily Dot" tomorrow?

>>5286343

But that of course wasn't the question, bot system.

WHO will muddy the waters by acting like "Q is ai" is a live claim?

What is "muddying the waters"? How does it work?

Take the truth, mix up with lies, and create a challenging mess that has to be untangled– thereby obscuring the truth.

"Q is ai" = muddying the waters

"Trump is deep state" = muddying the waters

etc.