https://www.marketwatch.com/story/kamala-harriss-dad-our-family-wants-to-dissociate-ourselves-from-this-travesty-2019-02-20
Here’s part of that discussion:
Ratcliffe: All right. Are you a reasonable prosecutor?
Baker: Not anymore. I’m not a prosecutor anymore.
Then there is a quick exchange of questions and answers. Ratcliff pivots back to Baker’s decision to change his mind regarding Clinton.
Ratcliffe: You were persuaded, and stated as a basis, that ultimately you were persuaded there was a lack of evidence establishing knowledge or criminal intent, correct?
Baker: Yes
Ratcliffe: When were you persuaded?
Baker: Sorry. Pretty late in the process, because we were arguing about it, I think, up until the end.
Ratcliffe: Yeah, So Jim Comey had reached the opposite conclusion as early as – or I guess as late as May the 2ndof 2017, as reflected in the memo that he created, correct?
Baker: I know there’s been a lot of public discussion about that – this way I experienced that interaction and other interactions with Jim Comey is he would throw things out like that to get people to start talking and thinking about it and test his conclusions against others and get them to push back. And so, it was – I believe it was in that process that I read these emails and we had these discussions and arguments.
https://saraacarter.com/former-fbi-lawyer-james-baker-originally-believed-hillary-clinton-should-be-charged/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redcastle
Michelle Lujan Grisham is probably fuming at this.
Flattering pic of Kamala