Trump is taking back federal money for the abandoned CA train project. He wants to sue to get all the federal money back.
Barr needs to follow suit and have his bean counters check the special counsel expenses and sue members of that team to get back any money spent on things other than the original mandate!
Can the source “facts” be independently corroborated?
Anyone can say they speak the facts, only counts if they are facts anyone can access and check.
Hearsay doesn’t count as facts — not even in court.
Spoke about the reputation of the author lb, but the reputation of the publisher and the editors they employ count just as much.
Would you more believe a story on Breitbart or the Huffington Post?
Related fact checking, does the content assume facts not sited, like man made global warming?
Unbiased writers don’t assume that is an established fact. Biased writers accept it as an axiom.