Anonymous ID: 20b5a4 Feb. 20, 2019, 1:54 p.m. No.5289761   🗄️.is 🔗kun

I might be far off but this post stuck out to me and the response…

 

Q Post 11

29 Oct 2017 - 8:20:11 PM

Key:

Military Intelligence v FBI CIA NSA

No approval or congressional oversight

State Secrets upheld under SC

Who is the Commander and Chief of the military?

Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must present itself? Why is this so VERY important? Who surrounds POTUS? They lost this very important power _ the one area of the govt not corrupt and directly serves POTUS.

 

Answers: Answers

Key:

Military Intelligence v FBI CIA NSA

 

MI has the most access to mined data and classified information. They have the best information gathering tools, They also have more power in general and are devoted to the constitution. MI can take over the investigations for the other three in cases of high treason.

No approval or congressional oversight

 

MI does not answer to Congress

State Secrets upheld under SC

 

United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953)

 

THE STATE SECRETS PRIVILEGE and THE SUPREME COURT https://www.scribd.com/document/41747792/State-Secrets-and-the-Supreme-Court

Who is the Commander and Chief of the military?

POTUS is the Commander IN Chief of the military.

The Chief is General John Kelly, POTUS' Chief of Staff, a Marine.

Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must present itself? Why is this so VERY important? Who surrounds POTUS? They lost this very important power _ the one area of the govt not corrupt and directly serves POTUS.

 

The Insurrection ACT allows POTUS to use military (& National Guard) as police force in the event of terrorist act, natural disasters and disorder that state police cannot contain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act ALL OF WHICH HAVE HAPPENED IN THE FIRST 8 MONTHS OF TRUMP'S PRESIDENCY. Specifically, the Las Vegas massacre was a great opportunity to impose these powers – 911 style, esp. since the cover story crumbled so quickly. The fact they didn't intervene suggests there is something going on behind the scenes.

SUMMARY

Military Intelligence v FBI, CIA, and NSA. No current approval or congressional oversight as State Secrets are upheld under Supreme Court. The POTUS can impose Military Intel take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies, but conditions must present itself. This is so VERY important.

 

Someone surrounds POTUS. They lost this very important power - the one area of the government not corrupt and directly serving POTUS.

extra answers

Anonymous ID: 20b5a4 Feb. 20, 2019, 2:06 p.m. No.5289952   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must present itself? Why is this so VERY important? Who surrounds POTUS? They lost this very important power _ the one area of the govt not corrupt and directly serves POTUS.

Under provisions of both the Homeland Security Act, Military Commissions Act(s), and The PATRIOT Act, the POTUS, either via his sec, or by sending armed troops to halt the attempts to resist launched by pseudo state operative Elaine Duke, current Secretary of Homeland Security, may engage in any number of activities to halt treason by forces hostile to the United States within the Armed Forces, or cease an entire Dept of US Gov from its compromised authority. These were checks and balances to the usurption and abuse of US internal policy which, as in the case of some Sept 11 Attackers whose visas were not thoroughly vetted, where these bureacratic practices could amount to "holes" in the US statuatory armor. Also, the Pat Act gives Potus the authority to declare any group hostile to US "terrorists".

 

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.crf-usa.org/america-responds-to-terrorism/the-patriot-act.html&ved=0ahUKEwi5lZrC57vXAhUm6oMKHQ_9DtUQFggsMAE&usg=AOvVaw3ZZbNiz5OhLr-k9nNy8Yt3

 

At that point, under PATRIOT Act detention is legal, and under the Military Commissions Act of 2008, the tribunals are now engageable.