>>5289043 (prev crumb)

>OIG releasing next installment.

DOJ OIG shares publicly its ongoing investigations

https://oig.justice.gov/ongoing/all.htm

Here is the only investigation that appears to be relevant:

Examination of the Department’s and the FBI’s Compliance with Legal Requirements and Policies in Applications Filed with the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Relating to a certain U.S. Person

The OIG, in response to requests from the Attorney General and Members of Congress, is examining the Department’s and the FBI’s compliance with legal requirements, and with applicable DOJ and FBI policies and procedures, in applications filed with the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) relating to a certain U.S. person. As part of this examination, the OIG is also reviewing information that was known to the DOJ and the FBI at the time the applications were filed from or about an alleged FBI confidential source. Additionally, the OIG is reviewing the DOJ’s and FBI’s relationship and communications with the alleged source as they relate to the FISC applications. If circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise during the course of the review.

They are looking specifically at whether the FBI knew the Steele Dossier was crap. This brings down the house.

This investigation will complement the one that looked at HRC emails, CF, and FBI mid-year team.

James Baker said they didn't prosecute HRC because they didn't have evidence of intent.

Could this one revert that and show that there was intent to avoid FOIA?