>>5295698 pb

Wapo hit piece (film) on Q

Re lack of evidence: Wapo never has good evidence. They use fake research; there's about 6 posts documenting that from December….use search term "hateful conspiracies" in the Archive and they will come up. Nobody has good evidence on either Q being wacko or patriots in general being hateful, etc. Just flashy graphics, stuff that sounds good but isn't solid.

I'm watching as I type….

Oh, this is the Sather interview. Sather was just talking about this….thought he was foolish to go for this, but he's a PR hound, can't turn it down…..I have a feeling they picked Sather because he's articulate but not very warm; wouldn't attract people, a bit robotic.

Their weakness is the crap research. New Knowledge is another one of the fake research groups and they've been discredited now. Although people sort of pretend they haven't (ie, the MSM).

>>5296013

Exactly, well-said, anon. And a great pic, Kek.

It's hard scrolling down the board, because I see all this shitposting on Ann Coulter but no evidence to back up the things people say. know Coulter is easy to hate, but the hate is because she's so incredibly annoying. I get that. But being annoying is not a crime.

And it's not even just what people say, it's the nastiness behind a lot of it. It's not trolling, it's like people who always have a lot of anger being really gleeful to dump all over someone else. It's the mentality of a lynch mob rather than patriots seeking to liberate our country.

I understand Q gave us a hint and where it's probably leading, but when I see stuff like this, I feel like this is a mob mentality rather than researchers focusing on facts and evidence.

If "we are the news," this is something I think we ought to try to outgrow. Don't bother replying, I'm getting off the board for now.