Ok, so lesson learned. Same text as before, but I pulled out the paragraph which mentioned Jesus so anons can focus on Mormons as Q-friendly people rather than arguing over their beliefs. Remember (((whose))) tactic it is to divide us over things like religion, and carry on. I lightly edited the rest based on a few other comments, and now here it is as a nice portable cap, for people who find this kind of information useful.
A few things that anons should know about Mormons:
They were infiltrated by masons within a few years after starting, and thus have been shaped by masons behind the scenes from early on. Ironically, their "Book of Mormon" is one of the greatest anti-masonic works EVER WRITTEN. I'm talking it carries fodder for serious cognitive dissonance that would split the church in a hundred directions if the deeper truths about masons ever hit their normies, because their beloved book goes into great detail about how evil the "Gadianton Robbers" were. Given a chance, they would be able to figure out how closely their temple rituals align with Satanic rituals. You see, "Gadianton robbers" are basically an ancient form of freemasons. They play a big and very destructive role toward the end of the Book of Mormon. Their league with Satan is described, and how they protect themselves with "secret signs and combinations" (secret handshakes and tokens that they use to identify each other), and how they infiltrate judicial systems exactly like masons do today, preventing true justice while protecting each other, etc, etc. There's a lot more to say in this area, but this is the essential information, intended to help guide a more nuanced understanding of the Mormons in a way that may be useful to anons.
Mormon normies are not aware of what I just said, and they are taught instead that the rituals which happen in their temples are to help them become holy. And their little old ladies believe it with all their heart and can't wait to go to the temple and do good things. They really work hard to "be good." They are kept busy 7 days a week doing things. This is one of the reasons Howard Hughes liked to hire them, as well as FBI and C_A. (It also helps that the best of their youth go on 2 year missions to another country and learn another language, skills very attractive to any spy org).
Little known fact: A few decades ago, they were analyzing why so many of their missionaries were suicidal while on their missions, and with some research they discovered it was linked to the fact that, right as they become missionaries, they are exposed for the first time to the "blood covenants" part of the temple rituals, where they were making oaths to accept being murdered (in horrifically plain detail) if they ever betrayed these secrets (same as masons, as we know). This was causing enough of them to freak out while on missions that the church quietly "removed" the worst part of the blood covenants… but said "well, they're still in effect," even though they no longer go through the gruesome hand motions which indicate that they'll die, etc. Although this is useful information to know, don't get stuck on this part, because the normie Mormons are kept in the dark on such things, and those are the ones anons want to connect with.
They're so caught up in their religious desire to do good things they're famously trustworthy. Like Boy Scouts (an organization they heavily support, at least until the LBTGQWTF started infiltrating them, as is well known). The moral standard to be a missionary (what everyone is taught, what young men and increasingly women are held to, at least) is quite high, so there is plenty of competition to be virtuous, honest, chaste, etc. I'm talking the normies, who have an annual financial review with their bishops to ensure they're paying full tithing and otherwise being "good." The higher up you go, the more sinister they get, but even at the top there are some "good" people, and by appearances, of course, all of them are "good."
(continued)
pt 2:
Oldfags will note this is kind of like Catholics, whose normies are also taught to hate masons, but whose higher-ups are all masons. Mormons are VERY hierarchically controlled, almost like a military in how lock-step they are. Hence their 'cult' status in the eyes of most (along with some weird beliefs which we'll get to shortly). Nevertheless, they have great charitable organizations within their system (have noticed it is harder to get help from them if you are not one of them, though), plus their missionaries, Tabernacle Choir, and so forth – lots of ways they can compete with each other to be "good." This is a side of Mormons not typically known by non-Mormons.
For the most part, Mormons are conservative (they do have a small liberal wing, but these are definitely a small minority). For example, they only recently (1970s) allowed blacks into their priesthood (even though Joseph Smith himself had ordained blacks, that practice died out when he did), and they do not allow women into this upper caste, although women do have a significant role in "Relief Society," which is another "good works" group who lead music, teach children, visit the sick, and so forth.
Mormons were survival "preppers" long before anyone else (and have an extensive internal system run by volunteers [more boy-scout-type-activity] which creates and distributes food and supplies intended to feed/support the entire family off the grid for months at a time if necessary), so their political alignment is not far off from the anons on this board. Some of them are already redpilled, and it would be VERY easy to redpill ALL of them if their leaders wanted that to happen because they are so hierarchically controlled. Like, within a couple months, literally millions of hardcore adherents digging, memeing, and praying. But, alternately, if their leaders don't want that, it ain't gonna happen. They have a shunning system almost as strong as the Amish/Mennonites, so if you're an outcast from them, it's going to hurt.
Missouri Mormons, in general, tend to be more reasonable than the Utah ones, since they trace back to a big "reorganization" that happened in the mid-1800s, by a large number who outright rejected polygamy and other similarly weird things that most people associate with Mormons (this was before being forced to reject polygamy, as explained below. These were people who basically never wanted to have anything to do with that). These types are also a little less arrogant, more genuine as people, probably largely because, yes, they were actually outlawed in Missouri for more than a century, til the state lifted its ban against Mormons (which was created when they were run out of the state in the 1840s). To be clear, by the late 1860s, Mormons were starting to trickle back into the state, but ones who did kept a more humble profile, lest they trigger the wrath of Missourians again.
Now for the weirdos. There are a LOT of weird Mormons, mostly in Utah, but numerically much smaller than the main, big church headquarted in Salt Lake (thousands vs millions). The big church was forced by the U.S. to give up polygamy in order for Utah to become a state, so they've been officially opposed to it since the late 1800s, after the reorganization people had already departed. Nevertheless, there are dozens of smaller groups which broke off because they liked polygamy, and these groups get VERY weird, just outright insane in some ways. Mitt Romney's extended family in Mexico has been involved in some of the weird things, but apparently not his immediate family, as he has clearly been one of those "Boy Scout" types all his life. He is somewhat typical of a Mormon bishop type, but appears to be more obviously entangled with the masonic agenda than a normal bishop. Perhaps Huber is a better example. Interestingly, their whole clergy is NOT paid, so they tend to quietly encourage people to become rich/successful in the way he is, with the more successful of them tending to become bishops and other kinds of regional leaders). Although there are occasional poor bishops, it's less common.
As soon as I first posted this, I found anons attacking Mormons, as if that were my point. My bad. My purpose in writing is not to up Mormons, but to introduce anons to the possibliity that they are, for the most part, decent people capable of understanding and working with Q in a constructive way, being easier to redpill than most people, and quietly carrying a powerful weapon against the deep state, embedded in their book since the early 1800s… waiting for a time like this…
You're out of scope. The purpose here is to introduce anons to the idea that Mormons are Q-friendly. You're welcome to go to other boards and divide over religion, but here, we're trying to find common ground, to Dig, Meme, Pray, and that is the reason I wrote what I did.
Far from proselytize, this is brutally honest about Mormon flaws, and how they've been infiltrated by masons. My purpose in writing is wake up some Mormons, to educate other anons about how easy it is to redpill Mormons. Having completely missed my point, you're clearly not in that audience, but others are.
I actually agree with all your points, but they are out of scope for the purpose of the essay, which is more about finding ways to unite rather than developing reasons to be divided.
Your underlying facts are correct, except the history starts with the Book of Mormon, not bloodshed. You're talking about the madness they got into years later, after they were infiltrated and controlled by masons. The ugly stuff is discussed ad nauseum elsewhere, here the focus is on how Mormons can be useful to Q.
Aye, that's the spirit! A place where we can agree!
(Was unaware that Mormons deny Christ, have known a lot of Mormons most of my life.)
Those under-roos are related to Masonic lore. They have masonic symbols embedded in them.
Nice Socratic approach there. Q is creating an environment where this can be done, for the first time in centuries on a massive scale. MormonAnons should begin dismantling their masonic stuff, using the Q model. Any high-ranking Mormons overhearing this conversation? Wanna be the Q of your church?
Think about it. Be careful, though.
Thank you, thank you, for pointing out that I made serious mistakes, but also agreeing with the overall main point. That's the kind of anon I wanna work with. That's what Q wants us all to do! This is the STONE for which his team is the KEY.
I liked this best, well said:
Mormons are an incredible target audience for the anon movement.
Now I can STFU, the idea is out there.
If this is not a recruitment space, why are we happy that the Guardian mentioned 30 million searches of QAnon, and Q said "actually, many more than that."
This is a recruitment space, and Mormons are an excellent target for anons, because they already accept a lot of key points, and we can help them disentangle from their masonic crap.
Wouldn't know. My dad took em off and burned em before I was born, turned his back and never looked back again. I grew up learning about the masonic influence in the Mormons. Never let go of Christ, though…
Brain dump. Thanks to the Romney news, someone was talking ignorantly about Mormons in early evening, I spent a couple hours responding then posted, now twice. I simply realized Q anons and Mormons have a lot in common. I'm done, the point was made. Lived through enough night shifts not to be ashamed. Carry on.
The Mormon slide began because Romney hit the news, and some non-Mormon asked very detailed, thoughtful questions about Mormons. My answer was the slide. Your point is a good one, though, and it's rare to meet someone who can cite the core beliefs of more than 1 religion.