Anonymous ID: a85577 Feb. 21, 2019, 12:32 a.m. No.5300126   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0149 >>0153 >>0178 >>0262 >>0264 >>0273 >>0369

Hi Q!

 

I appreciate the knowledge you have dropped here… But I would like to make a suggestion.

Some, maybe even a lot of what you have said has not panned out, you have given disinfo, and I appreciate that was necessary.

When you haven't lied or mislead or been simply mistaken, you have been so cryptic that the anons have been lead to wrong conclusions, which accounts for a lot of it.

 

I sense however that, things are going to change, and those who have not lost the faith will have their faith rewarded.

 

And for that reason, I suggest that you do one of the following things at some point…

 

Either come up with a new name, Or use a variation of Q, like Q+, or simply state that from now (or at some future point) onwards we can count on what you say to be the truth, not misleading and straight forward.

 

I say this because maybe we can trust the plan, even though no anon thought it was going to take this long, we can't trust you, not at least unless you turn a new leaf. And, then, if you can't answer something truthfully, then, don't answer.

 

Also, the answers should not just be technically truthful, but have the spirit of truth, We are so used to having to second guess what you say, it makes it hard to feel like we are on solid ground. You say we should trust, but Reagan said Trust but verify, and you are big on him, and Trump is well known for saying don't trust… And we are being taught we can't trust your words even if we trust your intentions.

 

Please don't take this as an insult, if you actually read this, also, I shouldn't need to point out falsehoods and misdirections and other such issues, we all know they existed and they are thrown in our face if we try and tell anyone about you. We need a new Q with a clean record, even if not for us, for winning new people over. and winning old ones back.

Anonymous ID: a85577 Feb. 21, 2019, 12:55 a.m. No.5300264   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0292 >>0305 >>0308

>>5300126

 

To those dissing my post. if I was wrong, you would point out how.

Instead of actually intellectually identifying a flaw, you are just making childish attacks.

 

But, I am a believer in Q, that Q is a part of Trumps team, or more to the point that Trump is a member of the Q team.

 

No one disagreeing with my post has actually disagreed with the assertion that Q has an imperfect record, sure the future might rehabilitate some seemingly wrong predictions (future proves past) but he has also told falsehoods, and even fully contradictory statements.

 

There is no harm in Q, with or without a name change, making a deceleration at some point in the future that disinfo will no longer be used.

 

What part of my post do you disagree with, that Q hasn't been perfect, or that turning over a new leaf might be of value, either way, you know I'm right, and negative replies are just getting butt-hurt, trying to protect Q, but, my post is clearly not an attack on Q, get past your feelings and acknowledge that even if the only evidence was Q saying "Disinfo is necessary" that it would be nice if at some point in the future when this goes way more public that Q might say "no more disinfo" etc…

Anonymous ID: a85577 Feb. 21, 2019, 1:06 a.m. No.5300329   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0334

>>5300262

The earth isn't flat. but, I didn't believe the JFK Jr stuff, but now i think it might be more likely he is…

 

But, he has given conflicting reports on JA, and where he is…

Was that DEFCON threat Nuclear, it wasn't, then it was, well I appreciate not wanting to worry people, but…

 

Think mirror, has everyone looking for reversed answers…

Much of this is due to Q being so damn cryptic… He ends up getting blamed for things that the anons incorrectly jump to, but, didn't he also say HRC was going to be arrested tomorrow back in 2017?!

 

There is just no way that Q can say something without us wondering "is this disinfo to affect the DS?", is this "think mirror"? And so on.

 

Q has promised pain, booms, suicide weekends more times than we have anything to show for it, maybe that's something on the future Q clock? or, not?

 

Q is great, but, he's like a psychic that is on the fritz, he gets enough right we are convinced re represents real value because we want to believe, but he's not going to make a believer of anyone skeptical at this rate.

 

Maybe Q cannot turn a new leaf due to some realities of the situation, the need for disinfo, plans being liquid making drops predict things that don't happen when expected (if you want to make God laugh, right!), but, if he can, he should!