Anonymous ID: c4df86 Feb. 21, 2019, 3:03 a.m. No.5300869   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0890 >>0904

>>5299666 (pb)

 

The question before the Court.

 

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/17-1091_5536.pdf

 

The question presented: Is the Eighth Amendment’s

Excessive Fines Clause an “incorporated” protection applicable to the States under the Fourteenth Amendment’s

Due Process Clause?

 

Like the Eighth Amendment’s proscriptions of “cruel and unusual punishment” and

“[e]xcessive bail,” the protection against excessive fines

guards against abuses of government’s punitive or criminallaw-enforcement authority. This safeguard, we hold, is

“fundamental to our scheme of ordered liberty,” with

“dee[p] root[s] in [our] history and tradition.” McDonald v.

Chicago, 561 U. S. 742, 767 (2010) (internal quotation

marks omitted; emphasis deleted). The Excessive Fines

Clause is therefore incorporated by the Due Process

Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

 

..

 

This was a Civil case. There is a big difference in a Criminal case. We get the Cabal $.

Anonymous ID: c4df86 Feb. 21, 2019, 3:32 a.m. No.5301010   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1024

Why is STEEL so important?

 

We will find out in the coming weeks.

 

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952)

 

RE: Presidential EO authority

Anonymous ID: c4df86 Feb. 21, 2019, 3:45 a.m. No.5301081   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1083 >>1086

>>5301054

 

https://twitter.com/AJGuglielmi?s=09

 

Anthony Guglielmi

Verified account

 

@AJGuglielmi

16m16 minutes ago

More

Press Briefing: Jussie Smollet is under arrest and in custody of detectives. At 9am at #ChicagoPolice Headquarters, Supt Eddie Johnson, Commander of Area Central Detectives Edward Wodnicki will brief reporters on the investigation prior to the defendants appearance in court.