how?
if it's used that way, yes, it's not good to transmit that kind of signal at a living thing. Isn't the technology directional?
if so that means that it can use far less power to transmit. Thus it wouldn't be bathing the whole world omnidirectionally.
the caveot is that technoology to direct the beam can be misused.
It is the same as if you pointed a high powered fire hose at a person, you might drown them or otherwise injure them. You don't ban the firehose because it might get used in a way that is harmful. You make it illegal to do that with a firehose. You still have assault charges.
5G may very well be, over all, much less power put out into the eccosystem.
the use of the directionality needs to be audited.
The best way to get highspeed data is through a fiber using what is known as ATM (asynchonous transfer mode).
there is little to no leakage of radiation.
yes, unrestrained use of 5G without audit ought not happen. It should not be used as a weapon, thus the data on 'pointing' of 'beam' ought to be available for audit.
In a house, in a neighborhood? 5 G is probably not a good idea. why? It's basically just fiber anyway. All it is is them proxeying a fiber network behind a thin wireless (5G) one.
what does that mean?
the fiber could go right into your home. You could buy your own wireless router. You don't need them doing it for you.
basically all they are doing is putting a middle man between you and your data.
But it's good out in the field. It's great for doing research. Its awesome on a factory floor.
Always prefer a wired connection for high speed data. Always.