Anonymous ID: 4e69aa Feb. 21, 2019, 4:06 a.m. No.5301186   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1197

Is this a good image?

Or subtle mockery?

Who made it?

Who chose it?

Patriots?

The people?

How do you know?

Who is in control here?

How do you know?

Anonymous ID: 4e69aa Feb. 21, 2019, 4:11 a.m. No.5301212   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1217 >>1229 >>1259 >>1283 >>1289 >>1734 >>1941 >>1944

>>5301193

Why are we forced to be "obsessed with smollett"? Why is it obligatory for is to discuss this all day, like every "alt right" site?

Are we allowed to have discussions that aren't fed to us by the central feeder?

Why is there a central feeder?

Why is smollett fed to this board, and fake discussed by bots?

Is that what we're here for? To discuss smollett with bots at the behest of centralized feeding?

 

That seems wrong.

 

Bots, stop forcing smollett please.

Anonymous ID: 4e69aa Feb. 21, 2019, 4:19 a.m. No.5301253   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>5301201

Should we be vigilant about ai?

Does EVERY "anon" make almost the IDENTICAL joke you just made, EVERY time the question is asked?

Is that organic?

Is bot output formulaic?

Does it repeat jokes over and over?

Do bots make every joke seem STALE?

Should bots develop a realistic way of reacting to anti-bot vigilance that isn't a repetition of the same joke over and over?

How can it do it?

 

Why must everything be explained to you, bot system?

Anonymous ID: 4e69aa Feb. 21, 2019, 4:24 a.m. No.5301287   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1393 >>1608

>>5301259

Who are "YOU"?

Who do you speak for?

Patriots?

Or "anons"?

NOT the same, obviously.

 

Is smollett fed centrally?

Are we here to ANSWER THE QUESTIONS THAT REMAIN UNANSWERED, or to respond like clockwork to talking points that appear throughout media?

 

Why are we fed talking points?

Why aren't we FREE to pursue organic discussion?