>HRC removed strong man in Egypt to free the MB to rule there, other strong men fell too, allowing the MB to take hold.
Secondly, there was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. However, Libya did not present a national security threat to the U.S. So, why did Hillary have an interest?
Certainly, her history demonstrated a little personal interest in the Middle East other than as a source for her Clinton Foundation fundraising — of which Qatar had been a dependable source practically since its founding. It is acknowledged that the history of the Middle East and its current events has been spoon-fed by advisors. They included at least two questionable sources: her aide-de-camp Huma Abedin, Anne Woods Patterson, who served as Ambassador to Egypt (August 2011-August 2013). Patterson’s friendship with the Egyptian Ikhwan would not have been acceptable to the el-Sisi government once they were ousted. Still, Clinton rewarded Patterson with the plum job of Assistant Secretary for Near Eastern Affairs. Another likely source was Gehad el-Haddad, whose employment as a director at the Clinton Foundation (2007-2012), overlapped with his official work as the English-language spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood beginning February 2011.”
http: //acdemocracy.org/hillary-clinton-libya-and-the-clinton-foundation/