Anonymous ID: 0d39e5 Feb. 21, 2019, 10:21 a.m. No.5306043   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6076

>>5305984

It is unfortunate how low the level of autism is during the day.

 

Clearly I'm the only anon that caught the true gravity behind the journo asking Q, Q responding with a screenshot of a MP invoking Q, and what the deeper meaning is.

 

It means, as I just postedโ€ฆ

Q is forcing the question now.

 

Wake up! Quit looking at the surface and DIG. Think!

Anonymous ID: 0d39e5 Feb. 21, 2019, 10:41 a.m. No.5306431   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6445 >>6450 >>6462 >>6484

>>5306364

>>5306178

>>5306307

 

Supposing Q 'did' get larped by a anon-fake journo

 

Does that really make any difference? Responding to a larp-journo essentially means that poor journo is going to get hammered on twitter with mentions

 

Outing a MP as invoking Q in a screenshot guarantees that MP will get a few questions asked about it.

 

It still adds up to Q forcing the question, regardless of the validity of the larp or no

Anonymous ID: 0d39e5 Feb. 21, 2019, 10:48 a.m. No.5306591   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>5306527

The journo wasn't the point to begin with.

 

The MP invoking Q in a tweet and Q responding with that - to a 'journalist' real or not, is what is important.

 

Quit getting hung up in irrelevant details.