>>5306321(pb) Context
>>5306465 (pb)
>No matter how careful I am, I still screw up, in part because of time pressure (at least at times)
I hear you too, Anon. We are not in imminent danger. Our keyboard theater allows us the luxury of TIME. If folks cannot hold their attention from one bread to another, that's their problem.
As Q followers and citizen journos, we must have credibility. How do we earn that? Zero defects. Therefore, we must be rigorous, cautious, and exacting – EVEN WITH Q.
Obviously, we're only human and we'll screw up. I certainly do, but we can guard against pitfalls by: 1) slowing down; 2) vetting, sourcing, etc.; 3) trust your gut.
Looking at McDonnell's twitter feed, he appeared to be the last person who would be a Q follower (hmmm). Couldn't find original tweet (hmmmm). Why did Q have an image without a link (hmmm).
WWG1WGA! Into the breach my friends, this is only going to get better!