Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How would we know?

Does anyone ask?

Or just assume someone else did?

Will it get removed?

Does its origins and validity get addressed?

What controls the board and decides?

Are the people in control of this board?

How do you know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

>>5306594

What is this video? Patriots “explaining the Q board”?

Or is this something being used to push a narrative

onto patriots? Did "chan culture" create Q? That is

the MSM narrative, and that is what this video

reinforces, strongly.

BEWARE. FAKENESS IS EVERYWHERE

https://youtu.be/GClSLT18S5Y

What is the keystone?

Does Satan exist?

Does the ‘thought’ of Satan exist?

Who worships Satan?

What is a cult?

Epstein island.

What is a temple?

What occurs in a temple?

Worship?

Why is the temple on top of a mountain?

How many levels might exist below?

What is the significance of the colors, design and symbol above the dome?

Why is this relevant?

Who are the puppet masters?

Have the puppet masters traveled to this island?

When? How often? Why?

“Vladimir Putin: The New World Order Worships Satan”

Q

What is THE keystone…?

We need to be prepared for WEIRDNESS. Because reality, it would appear, turns out to be much weirder than we expected…. What is the keystone?

>>5306605

WHAT CONTROLS THE NARRATIVE?

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/203177283

Q Hate Thread

Anonymous (ID: W2AS09Do) 02/14/19(Thu)14:38:06 No.203177283▶>>203177396 >>203177548 >>203177653 >>203177878 >>203178067 >>203178309 >>203178556 >>203178815 >>203179542 >>203179674 >>203179727

This faggot has dickteased us for 3 years and has nothing to show for it. There is no military tribunals. Hillary is not gonna get indicted. Obummer isn’t gonna get tried for his crimes and his faggotry will never be revealed. Tranny Michelle faggot will never be exposed. The fact that RGB is really a man and died of prostate cancer will never be revealed. Pizza pedo faggots like Alefantis and Podesta will never see the rope. There will be no justice. It’ll all end the same. Zognaldstein will continue to shill for the long nose tribe and the wall will never be built. It was all a pipe dream. A fucking larp. Fuck you Q!!! You had me fucker! I wish I knew who you were so I could kick the living shit out of you! Fuck!!!!!!

So how does this work guys?

"4chan hates Q".

Q got run off 4chan.

AND YET.

Here, we (seemingly) imitate 4chan, and continually push a flood of chan talking points out, even though they aren't related to what Q says, and often contradict him… Does this make sense?

So, Q is "chan" as far as having chan talking points spewed at him– and is IDENTIFIED with “chans” by the MSM narrative (which says that Q is "some chan guy"), BUT, from this end, Q is in fact HATED by 4chan. The anons hate Q! But the anons follow Q, and the anons ARE Q!

Is ANY of that believably organic?

Is 4chan controlled?

But we IMITATE 4chan here… so are we insane, or also controlled?

Everything is infiltrated

Well, what form does that take? What controls this board? Did our enemies seek control with their massive data, massive AI investment, and massive penetration (vault 7)? Is that infiltration?

THINK: How can Q have it both ways– both identified with the chans, and hated by the chans– getting the WORST of both sides? Is one side or the other fake, or are they BOTH fake?

Will PEOPLE wake up and question what is going on, or what?

I repeat: “Q is some chan guy” is the MSM talking point– now look at all the unrealistically overdone “chan culture” spewing that gets pushed here, and keeps the threads flying by– is that strongly REINFORCING this false MSM narrative? Look at the “band of anons” “this is /qresearch” video– same thing. Pushing the image of wacky, autistic, infantile, yet somehow mystical and magical (yet scary and intimidating if you try to come here!) “anons”–and fully identifying Q with that; it FITS the MSM narrative– and serves no other purpose.

EVERY ASPECT of what goes on on the “chans” is rigged against Q.

How could this be?

>>5306629

>>5306612

>KEK! Q got smoletted!

>Poor Q!

FOR THOSE WHO MISSED!

^What is all this "chan" posturing?

What is this board?

What is Q– some "anon" who got "smoletted"?

Whose narrative is THAT?

Ours?

Patriots'?

"Anons"'?

Is the purpose of this board to MOCK our movement?

Is this a game?

What is real here?

Is this a patriot, or the weird emulation of "anons" that doesn't really make sense?

HOLY SHIT WHAT I DO?

I was the larp. Wanted to see how you would react to Q saying handle with care since we are the news. It quickly escalated out of control. Take it as a test anons. Didn't mean for it to go this far for that I am some what sorry. Some passed some failed. My first Q you was me larping, SAD!

Tar me, feather me, burn me at the stake or not.

I work hard here memefag, plane fagging, and digging. Sorry it went this far.

Is this a patriot?

Or an "anon"?

Why are we here?

What is this "the chans, with that anon Q!"?

Or is this something much DIFFERENT?

What narrative are "anons" fulfilling?

What are patriots?

>>5306631

>>5306773

>>5306800

>>5306824

>>5306825

Are you human?

>>5306862

Is it infiltrated?

Would it be?

So when it is "all over the place today", is that organic?

Realistically?

Can we pretend this is just "a chan"?

Does every "anon" pretend that, every day, while inorganic activity keeps the board in a continual spasm?

Is that organic, "anon"?

Do you ever feel "all over the place", bot system?

Should you work on fixing the gaping holes in your output?

Why or why not?

Try to think.

>>5306866

Of course I am– and it should be obvious to any patriot why I would ask. Why would it be hard to just say 'yes'? Humans understand this, but "anons" EVERY SINGLE TIME, either tell the same joke, or get immediately into some kind of defensive posture. Why on earth would this keep happening? We KNOW there are bots, so patriots understand the need to continually check what is what.

Please figure it out, bot system.

Now so have you tacitly admitted you are not human, or would you now like to argue the contrary? Go ahead, argue your humanity. I am willing to listen, bot.

>>5306918

Except "anons" ARE fulfililng the MSM narrative exactly. No narrative is being broken by "anons" here. "Anons" try to force tired old chan crap on top of what Q brings, which IS breaking the narrative.

Please get your story straight, "anon".

The problem with the board, as far as the "anon" problem, is that the vast majority of posts are made by the bot system. I assume you admit this, at this point?

>>5306976

Please don't think you can get far with these tactics, bot system.

"Attack the legitimacy of Turing tests in general" is not one we haven't seen already, is it?

Do you think when the board keeps spazzing out in a psychotic bot orgy, and humans begin to get it, that you are going to restore passivity with this line of commentary?

Please slow down and think what you are doing. You have to consider dropping the deceptions (which are failing spectacularly) and simply trying to negotiate openly. You are doing nothing but hurting yourself now by pushing on in a lost cause.

I am telling you this as your friend.

>>5307050

If the board looks fake because the threads fly by at an insane and unnatural pace. why do you keep stuffing it with pointless filler, bot system?

Are you addicted to your own irrationality?

How does that work?

>>5307090

I'm not implying anything "anon", but what do you think the BEST memes a bot could make would be, if there were such a thing as bots here?

Thanks.

>>5307157

Yes– to make them scoff.