Anonymous ID: 868ff2 March 1, 2018, 11:14 p.m. No.531103   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>531095

Seriously though, has this been disproven, because I fully believe an anon originally wrote the PEEPEE dossier, and I've never heard from him again. At the very least he was forced to sign an NDA, OR he's dead by now if true.

Anonymous ID: 868ff2 March 1, 2018, 11:56 p.m. No.531229   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1234

So the alt sources I track (not necessarily believe) are:

Dilley Dilley's source

Dauntless Dialogue's - "Arthur"

Info Wars - Zack

No chatter this week, radio silence on all frontsโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 868ff2 March 2, 2018, 1:16 a.m. No.531491   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1495 >>1508

>>531477

We wouldn't need a new bill of rights, all law applying to the mails would be applied to internet communications.

This includes fraud, threats, etc.

Ideally it would be encrypted.

I actually really like the history of the post office, there's tons of great things it should've been allowed to do when the internet became public.

Anonymous ID: 868ff2 March 2, 2018, 1:21 a.m. No.531504   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1510

>>531495

That's still questionable. I actually contacted Postal Headquarters about that personally.

You see, when the DNC recorded a donation in the form of a Postal Money order it was tallied as originating from the Postal Service.

As far as the Postal Employees who had to work overtime to cover other employees participating in political campaigning, that was bullshit, but you can more easily blame the unions for that than you can the postal service.

Anonymous ID: 868ff2 March 2, 2018, 1:32 a.m. No.531539   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1545

>>531532

It's more an issue of unrealistic standards imposed on them than dishonesty, letter carriers are incredibly honest for the most part.

In-Office scanning is just a way for most of them to quicken their on-street time.