>Surprised Q has never mentioned it again
(Pancho/Pablo/Pedro whomever) from Getty (I think) posted on the board saying to ask for images taken in close sequence (as if the photog had been bracketing).
The Getty dude also said (basically) that the photog would be aggressively defended by the press if chan tried to start any shit.
VA train wreck right after that, I believe, slid the photo hunt, then all hell broke loose with the FF shit.
Photo in question was published c. 2 hours after being taken. The photo itself is a fairly big zoom for inside, but I don't know if that crop was right out of the camera or zoomed with software. No lens info in exif I saw.
Getty guy said photog used large JPG setting, not RAW. That indicates a litttle quicker editing with software post shoot, and I would think that with that zoom range Getty would edit to remove doxxing type stuff.
IMO high contrast of bright screen with phone frame makes it pretty easy to mask and select the screen in PS. Just have some stocks of phone screens in a hidden layer ready to paste in.
Smelling a lot like general fuckery if you ask me, but what else is new.