>>5307061 LB
Added the clock "coincidences".
Don't know what you saw as funny.
You are trying to provide proofs and yet ignoring a whole world of "coincidences" that Q has given us.
>>5307061 LB
Added the clock "coincidences".
Don't know what you saw as funny.
You are trying to provide proofs and yet ignoring a whole world of "coincidences" that Q has given us.
That is a new level of retarded Anon.
Normies can see the "coincidences" on the clock. Only you refuse to see them.
To disregard them as "stupid fucking nonsense" means you don't understand what we have been asked to do. Maybe reread these two crumbs (from over a year ago).
It is not illegitimate and it isn't a slide or nonsensical bullshit.
You just don't understand it. How many date/:marker coincidences do you need to see?