Sadly anons I wasn't here when Elizabeth Koh posted. But here or some anons that replied to her in a way I can imagine myself replying to her.
>>5304068 (pb)
>>5304051 (pb)
>>5304039 (pb)
As for the rest of the anons who replied to her without the the hallowed TITS or GTFO
WTF, were you guys sleeping?
Hi Liz.
You have a point. An important point. It was what General Flynn was talking about when he said the media did a diservice to THEMSELVES.
But TITS or GTFO is who we are. I mean, yeah, childish things must die eventual as one advances in years, but when in the face of Cabal journalism, I like that response.
But in the end, you are absolutely correct. It's like Q said, put the ego aside.
Still thought, it would tickle my ego immensely if TITS or GTFO gets printed in a Sunday paper… put EGO aside.)