dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

>>5306178 (old thread)

>KEK! Q got smoletted!

>Poor Q!

FOR THOSE WHO MISSED!

^What is all this "chan" posturing?

What is this board?

What is Q– some "anon" who got "smoletted"?

Whose narrative is THAT?

Ours?

Patriots'?

"Anons"'?

Is the purpose of this board to MOCK our movement?

Is this a game?

What is real here?

Is this a patriot, or the weird emulation of "anons" that doesn't really make sense?

HOLY SHIT WHAT I DO?

I was the larp. Wanted to see how you would react to Q saying handle with care since we are the news. It quickly escalated out of control. Take it as a test anons. Didn't mean for it to go this far for that I am some what sorry. Some passed some failed. My first Q you was me larping, SAD!

Tar me, feather me, burn me at the stake or not.

I work hard here memefag, plane fagging, and digging. Sorry it went this far.

^

Is this a patriot?

Or an "anon"?

Why are we here?

What is this "the chans, with that anon Q!"?

Or is this something much DIFFERENT?

What narrative are "anons" fulfilling?

What are patriots?

>>5306178 (old thread)

Anonymous ID: 5d09e1 Feb. 21, 2019, 11:37 a.m. No.5307427 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>7480

>>5307414

Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How would we know?

Does anyone ask?

Or just assume someone else did?

Will it get removed?

Does its origins and validity get addressed?

What controls the board and decides?

Are the people in control of this board?

How do you know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ