Q - The Plan to Save the World - https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

Who made this video?

Do we know?

It is very slick. Hardly amateur.

Do we know where it came from?

WHO DECIDED IT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THIS BOARD?

Or did it just show up, and was accepted?

Accepted by whom?

How do we know?

Does Jordan Sather push this video?

Does Jordan Sather also peddle things for money?

THINK:

If you knew certain truths were going to get out no matter what, what would you do?

Would you try to seize the communication of those truths?

Might you expose A LOT, while carefully and subtly controlling the emphasis?

Could controlling the emphasis control perception, and reaction?

Does this video present DIFFICULT and COMPLEX truths using simplifications that will make them seem absurd to many?

While at the same time being extremely slick, and hence convincing?

Does this video take the HARDEST part of our job– explaining complicated and also very weird realities to the public, and run roughshod over the need for careful presentation?

Does it just chuck out an interpretation that is easy, in many ways true, but in others very incomplete– and in any case likely to be ignored by many?

Is this a form of control?

Is saying “criminals took over” a simplification? Does it tend to make a complex reality look a bit cartoonish? And how does that (cartoonishness) make US look?

Is the title “plan to save the world” also cartoonish?

Does it undermine in many subtle ways?

Who made it?

How would we know?

Does anyone ask?

Or just assume someone else did?

Will it get removed?

Does its origins and validity get addressed?

What controls the board and decides?

Are the people in control of this board?

How do you know?

https://youtu.be/3vw9N96E-aQ

>>5308392

>>5308548

Why would you answer with a conditional statement, rather than with a simple, normal human response, "anon".

Look, you have a problem, bot system. I am trying to direct you to it through SHOWING it to you, rather than SAYING what it is… do you understand?

>>5308584

Why are you WAITING?

Is there something you should be DOING instead?

Are you a patriot?

Or an "anon"?

What if PATRIOTS need to lead the way?

We know we have the MUSCLE– is that perhaps not the point of one of Q's recent posts?

If military muscle is not the issue, then why must we wait?

The NARRATIVE is the key, but why?

Why should that delay?

Normies would not DIE if arrests happened.

Presented with the evidence, many would be relieved and instantly let go of the hopeless position they were stuck in.

So then WHAT is it about the narrative that is KEY– because I do believe it is.

Is it our WILL?

And is the contest happening on a different level than we can really grasp?

At least on current understanding?

What is the keystone?

WHERE? Where is it?

[HERE] and EVERYWHERE…?

What does that tell us?

Follow out the logic, and look around…

>>5308658

>>5308483

>Being a Clinton donor really pays off!

But doesn't it go deeper than that?

A mere donor could be thrown under the bus when convenient…

Epstein has POWER– it shows.

You can see when people are untouchable.

What does his power come from?

The public doesn't ask this question, but all the facts that should force it are known…

>>5308889