>>5307064 (pb)

>Whoever conspires with another person to violate section 245, 247, or 249 of this title… shall be punished in the same manner as a completed violation of such section

Great catch. Would be good to have some namefag attys (Levin, Ingraham, etc) give their comments on this clause, but the phrasing sure looks sketchy to me too.

>18 U.S. Code § 247. Damage to religious property; obstruction of persons in the free exercise of religious beliefs

>https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/247

Including Satanism.

https://lawstreetmedia.com/issues/law-and-politics/giving-devil-due-legality-satanism/

>>5308336

>>5308406

It's not law yet, though the House will most likely pass.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/430023-senate-passes-bill-to-make-lynching-a-federal-crime

The language in that bill really needs to be addressed now, especially with the hoax surrounding it.

>>5308441

>>5307064 (pb)

>>5308374

>‪[47] Days Ahead of Schedule!

Nice catch anon. Looks like we should reset the watch & start re-reading crumbs from 4/9/18 on for now.