>>5310508

THIS.

POTUS is setting the stage,notice how he says, "We must always be the leader in everything we do, especially when it comes to the very exciting world of technology!"

He's not advocating for 5G, he's advocating for total dominance. Would if there's something safer and more advanced than 5G that we don't know about or is classified? Would if it is conveniently revealed at the appropriate time? 5G would no longer be relevant would it?

>>5310624

Exactly, to my knowledge 6G doesn't even exist at this point in time. Would if it does and is classified? Would if it is completely safe for use and more efficient than anything before?

Trump hasn't screwed us yet and I doubt he's going to start now.