>>5312119

You realize when you mention irrelevant fame fags with ego and money stakes in their message, you literally are carrying water for them.

Most anons would never see or hear the names of these faggots if it weren't for people like you.

>>5312172

I'll say it again in case you couldn't hear over your hyperventilating reaction:

Dilley is obviously either comped or too stupid to know the difference.

If you suggest otherwise, you are comped or too stupid to know the difference.

>>5312241

>>5312267

It must be a new shill strategy to toss around vague boomerish insults and non-sequitur responses

It's an old shill strategy to irrationally defend irrelevant disinfo famefags and desperately try to push them on anons

Keep trying guys, I'm sure it helps take your mind off what's coming

>>5312393

It's OK buddy, you're not a shill I just read your 4 posts and realized you're just too dumb to realize I was on your side.

I forgive you.