Communication is Key

It really all comes down to the meaning of crumbs. Crumbs are hints. Q did not explain exactly how the comms work, he left us to figure it out.

Twice Q said (about learning comms) How many hints must we provide?

Four times Q said we have more than we realize/know.

27 times Q has said EXPAND YOUR THINKING

FUTURE PROVES PAST

In our latest task from Q (Feb 15th, we are to learn whether any recent shooters have received therapy in the past), we were clearly told:

We can guide, but you must discover the TRUTH.

>>521639 The logic.

The POTUS tweet deltas specifically mentioned by Q are 0, 1, 5, 10 and 15. If we expand our thinking, this points to any delta of 0, 1 or a delta divisible by 5. The clock moves in a clockwise manner (wind the clock), so (for example) the delta between POTUS tweets on 21 Feb (0940 and 1320) is 40 minutes, not 20.

The delta is backward looking and Q has proved repeatedly that the POTUS tweet deltas are not random. Specifically, the tweet deltas of 0, 1 or anything divisible by 5 are markers. And even where markers exist, they may be incomprehensible because they are for someone else. What we should know is to examine marker tweets and posts very carefully.

This is an idea that has upset some anons, but the nature of the comms is they are backwards looking and the future proves the past. If Q wants to point to a specific bit of digging, or piece of news or an idea, it's easy enough to use the POTUS tweet delta's after the fact to do so.

In February, there were 175 POTUS tweets and of those tweets, there were 31 deltas between consecutive tweets of 0, 1 or divisible by 5.

FEBRUARY MARKERS

Date Tweets (EST) Delta Links

_______

Note: Missing means sequential posts are not in the general thread, could be deleted or in a different thread

01 Feb (0702-1032) d=30 (archived: 8ch.net/qresearch/res/233710.html#234264 Missing 234263 and 264266 )

03 Feb (0839-0844) d=5 (archived: 8ch.net/qresearch/res/233710.html#234264 )

(0940-0940) d=0 (archived: 8ch.net/qresearch/res/256457.html#256994 )

(1953-1158) d=5 (archived: 8ch.net/qresearch/res/260495.html#261092 )

05 Feb (1542-0832) d=50 (archived: 8ch.net/qresearch/res/276751.html#277046 Missing 277047 )

06 Feb (0832-0837) d=5 (archived: 8ch.net/qresearch/res/284685.html#284996 Missing 284998 )

(1100-1105) d=5 (archived: 8ch.net/qresearch/res/285437.html#285733 Missing 285735 )

(1105-1745) d=40 (archived: 8ch.net/qresearch/res/285437.html#285562 )

08 Feb (0608-1213) d=5 (archived: 8ch.net/qresearch/res/304321.html#304676 Missing 304678 )

10 Feb (0920-1020) d=0 (archived 8ch.net/qresearch/res/326635.html#326857 )

11 Feb (1536-1946) d=10 >>339603 Missing >>339613

12 Feb (1548-0543) d=55 >>353889 Missing >>353888

14 Feb (1550-1555) d=5 >>375303

15 Feb (1425-1426) d=1 >>387580 Missing >>387593

17 Feb (1426-1446) d=10 >>410527 Missing >>410531, >>410533

(1436-1446) d=10 >>410620 Missing >>410621, >>410627

(1446-1511) d=25 >>410575 Missing >>410577

(1511-1516) d=5 >>410917

(2322-0702) d=40 >>414733

18 Feb (0702-0722) d=20 >>417014 Missing >>417015

(0733-0743) d=10 >>417118 Missing >>417123 and >>417124

(0743-0753) d=10 >>417157

(0811-0846) d=35 >>417167 Missing >>417168

(0855-1210) d=15 >>417450

(1413-2328) d=15 >>419192

20 Feb (1029-1249) d=20 >>440577

21 Feb (0940-1320) d=40 >>450720 and >>450723 (split across 2 breads)

24 Feb (1726-1816) d=50 >>485705

(2000-2210) d=10 >>487374 Missing >>487379 and >>487380

(2210-2211) d=1 >>488601

(2211-2256) d=45 >>488243 Missing >>488242 and >>488245

01 Mar (1306-1326) d=20 >>526547

(1631-1951) d=20 >>527669

(1951-1952) d=1 >>528966

(2158-2159) d=1 >>529818

(2159-2204) d=5 >>529798

________

Each anon can decide what, if anything is worthwhile in there, but the future proves the past.

I've also noticed an interesting pattern with non-marker tweets, but I'll leave that alone for now.

>>531651

Misspelled word: "dieing" instead of dying.

Q said that everything is done for a reason.

Latest POTUS tweet is at 0607. The keyword dieing/dying ties the (non-consecutive) tweets at 0542 and 0607 together for a 25 minute delta.

That's a marker for 0517 EST

>>531603 to >>531606 in the general research bread

Interestingly, >>531605 is not in the general research but it's within the marker time, and neither is >>531607 which could be in the time marker.

>>531783

Yes, it's a coded message that gets past the sniffers

Everyone is here, especially when Q posts. The alphabet agencies, the alphabet media, everyone.

>>531801

You're confusing the example with the method.

The timestamps are critical

The signatures are important (Q drops)

>>531805

In the day we learn the comms Q might be able to "officially" leave and allow us to work without being shilled by defeatists like you. Because Q would still be communicating with us on a much more subtle level.

As far as all the hoopla about this or that Trump comment, remember:

AS THE WORLD TURNS.

This is a scripted show. There is a plan in place and we're winning.

>>531871

DEFCON refers to one of Q's posts and the timestamps of POTUS tweets.

On Jan 7th this all went down and then Q explained it to teach about comms. So, useqanonmap.github.io and http:// trumptwitterarchive.com to pull up the relevant posts and tweets.

Q posts:

DEFCON [1] at 2109

DEFCON 1 at 2118

DEFCON [1] CONF

Revised [1] min at 2144

He explains in his post at 2201 and 2220.

>>531985

Wouldn't it be interesting if the reason the SS was in the school was to plant some hidden video cameras?

That carries with it the idea that they knew what was going to happen and the kids were allowed to die. But from a military standpoint, allowing them to die in order to shut the whole program down would be acceptable.

But did they really die? That's one of the questions, isn't it?

[14] live.

Perhaps PEOC doesn't mean what we think it means.

All indications are that the CIA has had more than one mind control program going for the past 50 years and that means there are a hell of a lot of these people out there. Trump talks about arming teachers and what happens? We get a teacher firing a weapon in the classroom.

Coincidence? Not at all.

Secret Service running active shooter drills in a school just before a real shooting takes place? When has the Secret Service ever run active shooter drills in a school?

Someone chose to put them in there for a reason. Who could have done that? Why would that have been done?

Everything points to foreknowledge of the event and that leads to the question of what the SS was actually doing in that school.

>>532093

That depends on what 'set up' means. Set up for a fall, or set up to record it, which means they had foreknowledge.

There is massive shit flying about how bad the NSA is but Q said that Rogers played the game to maintain control. The NSA falls under the DOD, which reports to the President. They were waiting for a worthy man and now they have one.

WE SEE ALL

WE HEAR ALL

If there was chatter about the shooting ahead of time, they heard it. What if part of that chatter involved CNN? Did they know ahead of time? That's massive liability if they did and didn't say anything. Then, on top of that, destroying the reputation of the patsy?

What if the entire thing really was a FF, but it was really our people who were running it and the bad guys only thought they were running it? Call it a FF within a FF.

It's been pointed out that none of the parents have filed suit against the school or anyone else. Why?

Why was the Secret Service in that school ahead of time?

Lots of questions, not many answers.

The future reveals the past

The news unlocks the map.

>>532166

Don't be sorry.

They are overcomplicating it by several orders of magnitude. There is only one question you have to ask yourself about these theories:

Do they point to a method that reveals useful information?

Take a look at this post:

>>532150

Seriously? Let's take the letter "X" and decide that it points to a Q drop on 12 November?

Q explained the stringers in later posts and they had nothing to do with now, they were about the operation in which Capt. Green was killed.

Read my original post and think about it.

>>531653

Either the deltas are chosen for a reason or they are not. Q has proven they are chosen for a reason. Therefore, we have ongoing confidence that the tweet deltas of 0, 1 and divisible by 5 are markers that point to something worth seeing.

>>532249

Actually, I did pay attention.

I have yet to see your alternative timeline yield anything worthwhile.

The POTUS tweet deltas cannot be disputed and they are backward looking. The future proves the past.

What you are talking about is similar to the high level economists who wrap plain BS in high levels of calculus and toss it out, knowing that almost nobody can follow the math but nobody wants to admit it, so all the other economists nod, look wise and agree with complete bullshit.

>>532289

Yes, I believe you will continue right down the primrose path, further from the truth.

Mirrors? Smoke and mirrors.